Cited by 83Gene expression and cancer classificationMachine Learning and Data ClassificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detecting potential labeling errors in microarrays by data perturbation

Open access

Abstract

Motivation: Classification is widely used in medical applications. However, the quality of the classifier depends critically on the accurate labeling of the training data. But for many medical applications, labeling a sample or grading a biopsy can be subjective. Existing studies confirm this phenomenon and show that even a very small number of mislabeled samples could deeply degrade the performance of the obtained classifier, particularly when the sample size is small. The problem we address in this paper is to develop a method for automatically detecting samples that are possibly mislabeled. Results: We propose two algorithms, a classification-stability algorithm and a leave-one-out-error-sensitivity algorithm for detecting possibly mislabeled samples. For both algorithms, the key structure is the computation of the leave-one-out perturbation matrix. The classification-stability algorithm is based on measuring the stability of the label of a sample with respect to label changes of other samples and the version of this algorithm based on the support vector machine appears to be quite accurate for three real datasets. The suspect list produced by the version is of high quality. Furthermore, when human intervention is not available, the correction heuristic appears to be beneficial. Contact: malossin@dit.unitn.it

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl346

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 25 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Malossini, A., Blanzieri, E., & Ng, R. T.
Affiliations
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
Corresponding author
Malossini, Andrea
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2006-06-09
Volume
22
Issue
17
Pages
2114-2121
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2170645625
Cited by
80
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
microarray data, data perturbation, classification stability, support vector machine, training data quality, label noise
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Computer Simulation, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Documentation, Models, Genetic, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Quality Control, Sensitivity and Specificity, Staining and Labeling, Reproducibility of Results, Information Storage and Retrieval, Artifacts, Sample Size, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review