The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gaussian interaction profile kernels for predicting drug–target interaction
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: The in silico prediction of potential interactions between drugs and target proteins is of core importance for the identification of new drugs or novel targets for existing drugs. However, only a tiny portion of all drug–target pairs in current datasets are experimentally validated interactions. This motivates the need for developing computational methods that predict true interaction pairs with high accuracy. Results: We show that a simple machine learning method that uses the drug–target network as the only source of information is capable of predicting true interaction pairs with high accuracy. Specifically, we introduce interaction profiles of drugs (and of targets) in a network, which are binary vectors specifying the presence or absence of interaction with every target (drug) in that network. We define a kernel on these profiles, called the Gaussian Interaction Profile (GIP) kernel, and use a simple classifier, (kernel) Regularized Least Squares (RLS), for prediction drug–target interactions. We test comparatively the effectiveness of RLS with the GIP kernel on four drug–target interaction networks used in previous studies. The proposed algorithm achieves area under the precision–recall curve (AUPR) up to 92.7, significantly improving over results of state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, we show that using also kernels based on chemical and genomic information further increases accuracy, with a neat improvement on small datasets. These results substantiate the relevance of the network topology (in the form of interaction profiles) as source of information for predicting drug–target interactions. Availability: Software and Supplementary Material are available at http://cs.ru.nl/~tvanlaarhoven/drugtarget2011/. Contact: tvanlaarhoven@cs.ru.nl; elenam@cs.ru.nl Supplementary Information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An introduction to ROC analysis
Fawcett, T. (2006) · Pattern Recognition Letters · doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010 · Cited by 21,879
Identification of common molecular subsequences
Smith, T. F., & Waterman, M. S. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0022-2836(81)90087-5 · Cited by 9,940
The relationship between Precision-Recall and ROC curves
Davis, J., & Goadrich, M. (2006) · Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on Machine learning - ICML '06 · doi:10.1145/1143844.1143874 · Cited by 6,559
Hopkins, A. L., & Groom, C. R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd892 · Cited by 3,305
From genomics to chemical genomics: new developments in KEGG
Kanehisa, M. (2006) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkj102 · Cited by 3,120
DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets
Wishart, D. S., Knox, C., Guo, A. C., Cheng, D., Shrivastava, S., Tzur, D., Gautam, B., & Hassanali, M. (2008) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkm958 · Cited by 2,861
Link prediction in complex networks: A survey
Lü, L., & Zhou, T. (2011) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/j.physa.2010.11.027 · Cited by 2,819
In Defense of One-Vs-All Classification
Rifkin, R. M., & Junior, A. B. D. R. K. (2004) · Cited by 1,598
Drug target identification using side-effect similarity
Campillos, M., Kuhn, M., Gavin, A.-C., Jensen, L. J., & Bork, P. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1158140 · Cited by 1,248
Prediction of drug–target interaction networks from the integration of chemical and genomic spaces
Yamanishi, Y., Araki, M., Gutteridge, A., Honda, W., & Kanehisa, M. (2008) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btn162 · Cited by 1,147
Cited by
Luo, Y., Zhao, X., Zhou, J., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., Kuang, W., Peng, J., Chen, L., & Zeng, J. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00680-8 · Cited by 916
Structure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H. J. M., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 · Cited by 892
Deep Learning in Drug Discovery
Gawehn, E., Hiss, J. A., & Schneider, G. (2016) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201501008 · Cited by 723
Zitnik, M., Nguyen, F., Wang, B., Leskovec, J., Goldenberg, A., & Hoffman, M. M. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.012 · Cited by 675
Tsubaki, M., Tomii, K., & Sese, J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty535 · Cited by 688
Metadata
- Authors
- van Laarhoven, T., Nabuurs, S. B., & Marchiori, E.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-09-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 3036-3043
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2106029302
- Cited by
- 934
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 15.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gaussian interaction profile kernels for predicting drug–target interaction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr500
- The paper
- van Laarhoven, T., Nabuurs, S. B., & Marchiori, E. (2011). Gaussian interaction profile kernels for predicting drug–target interaction. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr500
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.