Cited by 103Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsEnzyme Structure and Function

LOGICOIL—multi-state prediction of coiled-coil oligomeric state

Vincent, Thomas L., Green, Peter J., Woolfson, Derek N.·2013·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: The coiled coil is a ubiquitous α-helical protein-structure domain that directs and facilitates protein–protein interactions in a wide variety of biological processes. At the protein-sequence level, the coiled coil is readily recognized via a conspicuous heptad repeat of hydrophobic and polar residues. However, structurally coiled coils are more complicated, existing in a wide range of oligomer states and topologies. As a consequence, predicting these various states from sequence remains an unmet challenge. Results: This work introduces LOGICOIL, the first algorithm to address the problem of predicting multiple coiled-coil oligomeric states from protein-sequence information alone. By covering >90% of the known coiled-coil structures, LOGICOIL is a net improvement compared with other existing methods, which achieve a predictive coverage of ∼31% of this population. This leap in predictive power offers better opportunities for genome-scale analysis, and analyses of coiled-coil containing protein assemblies. Availability: LOGICOIL is available via a web-interface at http://coiledcoils.chm.bris.ac.uk/LOGICOIL. Source code, training sets and supporting information can be downloaded from the same site. Contact: D.N.Woolfson@bristol.ac.uk Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts648

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vincent, T. L., Green, P. J., & Woolfson, D. N.
Affiliations
University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2012-11-04
Volume
29
Issue
1
Pages
69-76
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2125358782
Cited by
103
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/D063485/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
Keywords
coiled coil, protein structure prediction from sequence, heptad repeat, protein-protein interaction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Bayes Theorem, Software, Protein Structure, Secondary, Sequence Analysis, Protein, Protein Multimerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review