Cited by 441Epigenetics and DNA MethylationGene expression and cancer classificationGenetic Associations and Epidemiology

Reference-free cell mixture adjustments in analysis of DNA methylation data

Open access
Houseman, Eugene Andres, Molitor, John, Marsit, Carmen J.·2014·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Recently there has been increasing interest in the effects of cell mixture on the measurement of DNA methylation, specifically the extent to which small perturbations in cell mixture proportions can register as changes in DNA methylation. A recently published set of statistical methods exploits this association to infer changes in cell mixture proportions, and these methods are presently being applied to adjust for cell mixture effect in the context of epigenome-wide association studies. However, these adjustments require the existence of reference datasets, which may be laborious or expensive to collect. For some tissues such as placenta, saliva, adipose or tumor tissue, the relevant underlying cell types may not be known. Results: We propose a method for conducting epigenome-wide association studies analysis when a reference dataset is unavailable, including a bootstrap method for estimating standard errors. We demonstrate via simulation study and several real data analyses that our proposed method can perform as well as or better than methods that make explicit use of reference datasets. In particular, it may adjust for detailed cell type differences that may be unavailable even in existing reference datasets. Availability and implementation: Software is available in the R package RefFreeEWAS. Data for three of four examples were obtained from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), accession numbers GSE37008, GSE42861 and GSE30601, while reference data were obtained from GEO accession number GSE39981. Contact: andres.houseman@oregonstate.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu029

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some clinical studies using peripheral blood to examine DNA methylation changes in MDD corrected for cell composition.

    “some clinical studies using peripheral blood to examine DNA methylation changes in MDD corrected for cell composition,101,102”

    From Epigenetic regulation in major depression and other stress-related disorders: molecular mechanisms, clinical relevance and therapeutic potential (2023) · cites this paper as [101]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) discusses how cell mixtures can affect blood DNA methylation measurements, and Data Examples (page unavailable) describes adjusting peripheral-blood analyses for cell composition. The studies described there concern rheumatoid arthritis and other outcomes, not MDD; the source does not support the MDD-specific part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Adalsteinsson BT Heterogeneity in white blood cells has potential to confound DNA methylation measurements PLoS One 2012 7 e46705 23071618 PMC3465258
  2. Banister CE Infant growth restriction is associated with distinct patterns of DNA methylation in human placentas Epigenetics 2011 6 920 927 21758004 PMC3154432
  3. Baron U DNA methylation analysis as a tool for cell typing Epigenetics 2006 1 55 60 17998806
  4. Bock C Analysing and interpreting DNA methylation data Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012 13 705 719 22986265
  5. Bracken AP Genome-wide mapping of Polycomb target genes unravels their roles in cell fate transitions Genes Dev. 2006 20 1123 1136 16618801 PMC1472472
  6. Buja A Eyuboglu N Remarks on parallel analysis Multivariate Behav. Res. 1992 27 509 540 26811132
  7. Houseman EA DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13 86 22568884 PMC3532182
  8. Ji H Comprehensive methylome map of lineage commitment from haematopoietic progenitors Nature 2011 467 338 342 PMC2956609 20720541
  9. Johnson WE Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods Biostatistics 2007 8 118 127 16632515
  10. Koestler DC Peripheral blood immune cell methylation profiles are associated with nonhematopoietic cancers Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2012 21 1293 1302 22714737 PMC3415587
  11. Lam LL Factors underlying variable DNA methylation in a human community cohort Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2012 109 Suppl. 2 17253 17260 23045638 PMC3477380
  12. Langevin SM Peripheral blood DNA methylation profiles are indicative of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an epigenome-wide association study Epigenetics 2012 7 291 299 22430805 PMC3335952
  13. Lee TI Control of developmental regulators by Polycomb in human embryonic stem cells Cell 2006 125 301 313 16630818 PMC3773330
  14. Liu Y Epigenome-wide association data implicate DNA methylation as an intermediary of genetic risk in rheumatoid arthritis Nat. Biotechnol. 2013 31 142 147 23334450 PMC3598632
  15. Natoli G Maintaining cell identity through global control of genomic organization Immunity 2011 33 12 24 20643336
  16. Reinius LE Differential DNA methylation in purified human blood cells: implications for cell lineage and studies on disease susceptibility PLoS One 2012 7 e41361 22848472 PMC3405143
  17. Squazzo SL Suz12 binds to silenced regions of the genome in a cell-type-specific manner Genome Res. 2006 16 890 900 16751344 PMC1484456
  18. Teschendorff AE Independent surrogate variable analysis to deconvolve confounding factors in large-scale microarray profiling studies Bioinformatics 2011 27 1496 1505 21471010
  19. Wang X A genome-wide methylation study on essential hypertension in young African American males PLoS One 2013 8 e53938 23325143 PMC3542324
  20. Zouridis H Methylation subtypes and large-scale epigenetic alterations in gastric cancer Sci. Transl. Med. 2012 4 156ra140 23076357

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Houseman, E. A., Molitor, J., & Marsit, C. J.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
Corresponding author
Houseman, Eugene Andres
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2014-01-21
Volume
30
Issue
10
Pages
1431-1439
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2170324063
Cited by
441
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 43 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 50 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 21
FWCI
22.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Oregon State University
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH094609)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA023108)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Keywords
DNA methylation, cell mixtures, epigenome-wide association study, cell type proportions, bootstrap standard errors
MeSH terms
Humans, Software, Gene Expression, Sequence Analysis, DNA, DNA Methylation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review