The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Drug repositioning based on comprehensive similarity measures and Bi-Random walk algorithm
Abstract
Motivation: Drug repositioning, which aims to identify new indications for existing drugs, offers a promising alternative to reduce the total time and cost of traditional drug development. Many computational strategies for drug repositioning have been proposed, which are based on similarities among drugs and diseases. Current studies typically use either only drug-related properties (e.g. chemical structures) or only disease-related properties (e.g. phenotypes) to calculate drug or disease similarity, respectively, while not taking into account the influence of known drug–disease association information on the similarity measures. Results: In this article, based on the assumption that similar drugs are normally associated with similar diseases and vice versa, we propose a novel computational method named MBiRW, which utilizes some comprehensive similarity measures and Bi-Random walk (BiRW) algorithm to identify potential novel indications for a given drug. By integrating drug or disease features information with known drug–disease associations, the comprehensive similarity measures are firstly developed to calculate similarity for drugs and diseases. Then drug similarity network and disease similarity network are constructed, and they are incorporated into a heterogeneous network with known drug–disease interactions. Based on the drug–disease heterogeneous network, BiRW algorithm is adopted to predict novel potential drug–disease associations. Computational experiment results from various datasets demonstrate that the proposed approach has reliable prediction performance and outperforms several recent computational drug repositioning approaches. Moreover, case studies of five selected drugs further confirm the superior performance of our method to discover potential indications for drugs practically. Availability and Implementation: http://github.com//bioinfomaticsCSU/MBiRW . Contact: jxwang@mail.csu.edu.cn Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Drug repositioning: identifying and developing new uses for existing drugs
Ashburn, T. T., & Thor, K. B. (2004) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1468 · Cited by 3,237
Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM), a knowledgebase of human genes and genetic disorders
Hamosh, A. (2002) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/30.1.52 · Cited by 762
Cited by
Zitnik, M., Nguyen, F., Wang, B., Leskovec, J., Goldenberg, A., & Hoffman, M. M. (2019) · Information Fusion · doi:10.1016/j.inffus.2018.09.012 · Cited by 675
Machine Learning for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction
Chen, R., Liu, X., Jin, S., Lin, J., & Liu, J. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23092208 · Cited by 292
Formatting biological big data for modern machine learning in drug discovery
Duran‐Frigola, M., Fernández‐Torras, A., Bertoni, M., & Aloy, P. (2019) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1408 · Cited by 25
A drug repositioning algorithm based on a deep autoencoder and adaptive fusion
Chen, P., Bao, T., Yu, X., & Liu, Z. (2021) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-021-04406-y · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Luo, H., Wang, J., Li, M., Luo, J., Peng, X., Wu, F.-X., & Pan, Y.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2016-05-05
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2664-2671
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2346950316
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 28.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Drug repositioning based on comprehensive similarity measures and Bi-Random walk algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw228
- The paper
- Luo, H., Wang, J., Li, M., Luo, J., Peng, X., Wu, F.-X., & Pan, Y. (2016). Drug repositioning based on comprehensive similarity measures and Bi-Random walk algorithm. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btw228
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.