Cited by 56Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenomics and Rare Diseases

A weighted exact test for mutually exclusive mutations in cancer

Open access
Leiserson, Mark DM, Reyna, Matthew A, Raphael, Benjamin J·2016·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: The somatic mutations in the pathways that drive cancer development tend to be mutually exclusive across tumors, providing a signal for distinguishing driver mutations from a larger number of random passenger mutations. This mutual exclusivity signal can be confounded by high and highly variable mutation rates across a cohort of samples. Current statistical tests for exclusivity that incorporate both per-gene and per-sample mutational frequencies are computationally expensive and have limited precision. Results: We formulate a weighted exact test for assessing the significance of mutual exclusivity in an arbitrary number of mutational events. Our test conditions on the number of samples with a mutation as well as per-event, per-sample mutation probabilities. We provide a recursive formula to compute P-values for the weighted test exactly as well as a highly accurate and efficient saddlepoint approximation of the test. We use our test to approximate a commonly used permutation test for exclusivity that conditions on per-event, per-sample mutation frequencies. However, our test is more efficient and it recovers more significant results than the permutation test. We use our Weighted Exclusivity Test (WExT) software to analyze hundreds of colorectal and endometrial samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas, which are two cancer types that often have extremely high mutation rates. On both cancer types, the weighted test identifies sets of mutually exclusive mutations in cancer genes with fewer false positives than earlier approaches. Availability and Implementation: See http://compbio.cs.brown.edu/projects/wext for software. Contact: braphael@cs.brown.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw462

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. References https://doi.org/10.7303/syn1710680. · DOI
  2. http://gdac.broadinstitute.org/runs/stddata__2016_01_28/data/THCA/ 20160128/gdac.broadinstitute.org_THCA.Mutation_Packager_Calls. Level_3.2016012800.0.0.tar.gz. http://www.mayomedicallaboratories.com/test-catalog/ ClinicalþandþInterpretive/62800. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leiserson, M. D., Reyna, M. A., & Raphael, B. J.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Raphael, Benjamin J
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2016-08-29
Volume
32
Issue
17
Pages
i736-i745
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2592761229
Cited by
56
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10
FWCI
3.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIH (R01HG005690, R01HG007069, R01CA180776)
  • NSF (GRFP DGE 0228243)
  • Burroughs Wellcome Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
Keywords
mutually exclusive mutations, driver mutations, passenger mutations, somatic mutations, saddlepoint approximation, permutation tests, mutation rate, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, cancer genomics
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Probability, Software

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review