Cited by 251Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and CancerBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Combinatorial patterns of somatic gene mutations in cancer

Yeang, Chen-Hsiang, McCormick, Frank, Levine, Arnold·2008·The FASEB Journal

Abstract

Cancer is a complex process in which the abnormalities of many genes appear to be involved. The combinatorial patterns of gene mutations may reveal the functional relations between genes and pathways in tumorigenesis as well as identify targets for treatment. We examined the patterns of somatic mutations of cancers from Catalog of Somatic Mutations in Cancer (COSMIC), a large‐scale database curated by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. The frequently mutated genes are well‐known oncogenes and tumor suppressors that are involved in generic processes of cell‐cycle control, signal transduction, and stress responses. These “signatures” of gene mutations are heterogeneous when the cancers from different tissues are compared. Mutations in genes functioning in different pathways can occur in the same cancer ( i.e. , co‐occur), whereas those in genes functioning in the same pathway are rarely mutated in the same sample. This observation supports the view of tumorigenesis as derived from a process like Darwinian evolution. However, certain combinatorial mutational patterns violate these simple rules and demonstrate tissue‐specific variations. For instance, mutations of genes in the Ras and Wnt pathways tend to co‐occur in the large intestine but are mutually exclusive in cancers of the pancreas. The relationships between mutations in different samples of a cancer can also reveal the temporal orders of mutational events. In addition, the observed mutational patterns suggest candidates of new cosequencing targets that can either reveal novel patterns or validate the predictions deduced from existing patterns. These combinatorial mutational patterns provide guiding information for the ongoing cancer genome projects.—Yeang, C‐H., McCormick, F., Levine, A. Combinatorial patterns of somatic gene mutations in cancer. FASEB J. 22, 2605–2622 (2008)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1096/fj.08-108985

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yeang, C.-H., McCormick, F., & Levine, A.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Advanced Study (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
The FASEB Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2008-04-23
Volume
22
Issue
8
Pages
2605-2622
ISSN
  • 0892-6638 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-6860
OpenAlex
W2126172213
Cited by
251
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The FASEB Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
somatic mutations, COSMIC, oncogenes, tumor suppressor, co-occurring mutations, pathway signatures, Ras signaling, Wnt signaling
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Humans, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Neoplasms, Oncogenes, Organ Specificity, Stress, Physiological, Signal Transduction, Genes, Tumor Suppressor, Databases, Genetic, Cell Line, Tumor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review