Cited by 26Gene expression and cancer classificationStatistical Methods and InferenceAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models

Robust and sparse correlation matrix estimation for the analysis of high-dimensional genomics data

Serra, Angela, Coretto, Pietro, Fratello, Michele, Tagliaferri, Roberto·2018·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: Microarray technology can be used to study the expression of thousands of genes across a number of different experimental conditions, usually hundreds. The underlying principle is that genes sharing similar expression patterns, across different samples, can be part of the same co-expression system, or they may share the same biological functions. Groups of genes are usually identified based on cluster analysis. Clustering methods rely on the similarity matrix between genes. A common choice to measure similarity is to compute the sample correlation matrix. Dimensionality reduction is another popular data analysis task which is also based on covariance/correlation matrix estimates. Unfortunately, covariance/correlation matrix estimation suffers from the intrinsic noise present in high-dimensional data. Sources of noise are: sampling variations, presents of outlying sample units, and the fact that in most cases the number of units is much larger than the number of genes. Results: In this paper, we propose a robust correlation matrix estimator that is regularized based on adaptive thresholding. The resulting method jointly tames the effects of the high-dimensionality, and data contamination. Computations are easy to implement and do not require hand tunings. Both simulated and real data are analyzed. A Monte Carlo experiment shows that the proposed method is capable of remarkable performances. Our correlation metric is more robust to outliers compared with the existing alternatives in two gene expression datasets. It is also shown how the regularization allows to automatically detect and filter spurious correlations. The same regularization is also extended to other less robust correlation measures. Finally, we apply the ARACNE algorithm on the SyNTreN gene expression data. Sensitivity and specificity of the reconstructed network is compared with the gold standard. We show that ARACNE performs better when it takes the proposed correlation matrix estimator as input. Availability and implementation: The R software is available at https://github.com/angy89/RobustSparseCorrelation. Contact: aserra@unisa.it or robtag@unisa.it. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx642

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Commonly used similarity measures may not be robust or efficient for measuring distance between two sets of high-dimensional sparse scRNA-seq data.

    “Meanwhile, the commonly-used similarity measures (i.e.cosine similarity, Spearman's correlation, and Pearson correlation) may not be robust or efficient for measuring the distance between two sets of high-dimensional sparse scRNA-seq data 14 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Serra, A., Coretto, P., Fratello, M., & Tagliaferri, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Salerno (IT)
  • University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (IT)
Corresponding author
  • Serra, Angela
  • Tagliaferri, Roberto
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2017-10-12
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
625-634
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2763420753
Cited by
25
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
Keywords
high-dimensional data, gene expression microarrays, adaptive thresholding, regularization, outlier robustness, gene co-expression network, ARACNE, network inference, dimensionality reduction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Humans, Neoplasms, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review