Cited by 45Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesGenome Rearrangement Algorithms

SV2: accurate structural variation genotyping and de novo mutation detection from whole genomes

Open access
Antaki, Danny, Brandler, William M, Sebat, Jonathan·2018·Bioinformatics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Motivation: Structural variation (SV) detection from short-read whole genome sequencing is error prone, presenting significant challenges for population or family-based studies of disease. Results: Here, we describe SV2, a machine-learning algorithm for genotyping deletions and duplications from paired-end sequencing data. SV2 can rapidly integrate variant calls from multiple structural variant discovery algorithms into a unified call set with high genotyping accuracy and capability to detect de novo mutations. Availability and implementation: SV2 is freely available on GitHub (https://github.com/dantaki/SV2). Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx813

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Antaki, D., Brandler, W. M., & Sebat, J.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Sebat, Jonathan
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2017-12-29
Volume
34
Issue
10
Pages
1774-1777
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2779603631
Cited by
45
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4
FWCI
4.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Bioinformatics (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • NIH (HG007497, MH076431 and MH113715, GM008666)
  • Amazon Web Services
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
Keywords
structural variants, structural variant genotyping, deletion, duplication, machine learning, paired-end sequencing, whole genome sequencing
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Algorithms, Genotype, Humans, Mutation, Software, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review