The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep learning improves antimicrobial peptide recognition
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is a growing concern. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), natural components of innate immunity, are popular targets for developing new drugs. Machine learning methods are now commonly adopted by wet-laboratory researchers to screen for promising candidates. Results: In this work, we utilize deep learning to recognize antimicrobial activity. We propose a neural network model with convolutional and recurrent layers that leverage primary sequence composition. Results show that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art classification models on a comprehensive dataset. By utilizing the embedding weights, we also present a reduced-alphabet representation and show that reasonable AMP recognition can be maintained using nine amino acid types. Availability and implementation: Models and datasets are made freely available through the Antimicrobial Peptide Scanner vr.2 web server at www.ampscanner.com. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Matplotlib: a 2D graphics environment
Hunter, J. D. (2007) · Computing in Science & Engineering · doi:10.1109/mcse.2007.55 · Cited by 39,249
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., Tiberti, N., Lisacek, F., Sanchez, J.-C., & Müller, M. (2011) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-77 · Cited by 13,697
<tt>BLAT</tt> —The <tt>BLAST</tt> -Like Alignment Tool
Kent, W. J. (2002) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.229202 · Cited by 8,480
Prediction of antimicrobial peptides based on the adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system application
Fernandes, F. C., Rigden, D. J., & Franco, O. L. (2012) · Peptide Science · doi:10.1002/bip.22066 · Cited by 67
Cited by
Discovering highly potent antimicrobial peptides with deep generative model HydrAMP
Szymczak, P., Możejko, M., Grzegorzek, T., Jurczak, R., Bauer, M., Neubauer, D., Sikora, K., Michalski, M., Sroka, J., Setny, P., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-36994-z · Cited by 231
UniKP: a unified framework for the prediction of enzyme kinetic parameters
Yu, H., Deng, H., He, J., Keasling, J. D., & Luo, X. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-44113-1 · Cited by 226
Painting Peptides With Antimicrobial Potency Through Deep Reinforcement Learning
Dong, R., Cao, Q., & Song, C. (2025) · Advanced Science · doi:10.1002/advs.202506332 · Cited by 11
Plant-associated fungi co-opt ancient antimicrobials for host manipulation
Mesny, F., Wolf, V., López-Moral, A., Kraege, A., Punt, W., Liu, S., Zhu, J., Park, J., Sato, Y., & Thomma, B. P. H. J. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aec1406 · Cited by 11
Elder, L. H., & Onufriev, A. V. (2025) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c02263 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Veltri, D., Kamath, U., & Shehu, A.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-03-24
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2740-2747
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2791848964
- Cited by
- 593
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
