Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NCycDB: a curated integrative database for fast and accurate metagenomic profiling of nitrogen cycling genes

Tu, Qichao, Lin, Lu, Cheng, Lei, Deng, Ye, He, Zhili·2019·Bioinformatics

Abstract

Motivation: The nitrogen (N) cycle is a collection of important biogeochemical pathways in the Earth ecosystem and has gained extensive foci in ecology and environmental studies. Currently, shotgun metagenome sequencing has been widely applied to explore gene families responsible for N cycle processes. However, there are problems in applying publically available orthology databases to profile N cycle gene families in shotgun metagenomes, such as inefficient database searching, unspecific orthology groups and low coverage of N cycle genes and/or gene (sub)families. Results: To solve these issues, this study built a manually curated integrative database (NCycDB) for fast and accurate profiling of N cycle gene (sub)families from shotgun metagenome sequencing data. NCycDB contains a total of 68 gene (sub)families and covers eight N cycle processes with 84 759 and 219 146 representative sequences at 95 and 100% identity cutoffs, respectively. We also identified 1958 homologous orthology groups and included corresponding sequences in the database to avoid false positive assignments due to ‘small database’ issues. We applied NCycDB to characterize N cycle gene (sub)families in 52 shotgun metagenomes from the Global Ocean Sampling expedition. Further analysis showed that the structure and composition of N cycle gene families were most strongly correlated with latitude and temperature. NCycDB is expected to facilitate N cycle studies via shotgun metagenome sequencing approaches in various environments. The framework developed in this study can be served as a good reference to build similar knowledge-based functional gene databases in various processes and pathways. Availability and implementation: NCycDB database files are available at https://github.com/qichao1984/NCyc. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty741

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Cited by

See all 470

Metadata

Authors
Tu, Q., Lin, L., Cheng, L., Deng, Y., & He, Z.
Venue
Bioinformatics
Published
2018-08-28
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1040-1048
ISSN
  • 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
  • 1367-4811
OpenAlex
W2888863429
Cited by
470
References
47
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NCycDB: a curated integrative database for fast and accurate metagenomic profiling of nitrogen cycling genes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty741
The paper
Tu, Q., Lin, L., Cheng, L., Deng, Y., & He, Z. (2019). NCycDB: a curated integrative database for fast and accurate metagenomic profiling of nitrogen cycling genes. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bty741

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.