The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A general method for analysis of covariance structures
Abstract
It is assumed that observations on a set of variables have a multivariate normal distribution with a general parametric form of the mean vector and the variance-covariance matrix. Any parameter of the model may be fixed, free or constrained to be equal to other parameters. The free and constrained parameters are estimated by maximum likelihood. A wide range of models is obtained from the general model by imposing various specifications on the parametric structure of the general model. Examples are given of areas and problems, especially in the behavioural sciences, where the method may be useful.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
lavaan : An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling
Rosseel, Y. (2012) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v048.i02 · Cited by 27,955
Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378101800313 · Cited by 13,287
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y.-M., & Lauro, C. (2005) · Computational Statistics & Data Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005 · Cited by 6,312
Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective.
Bollen, K., & Lennox, R. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.110.2.305 · Cited by 3,618
Lower bounds on sample size in structural equation modeling
Christopher Westland, J. (2010) · Electronic Commerce Research and Applications · doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2010.07.003 · Cited by 1,846
Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests
Jöreskog, K. G. (1971) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291393 · Cited by 1,481
Self-citationStructural equation modeling for travel behavior research
Golob, T. F. (2003) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/s0191-2615(01)00046-7 · Cited by 1,043
Reassessing the reliability and validity of self-report delinquency measures
Huizinga, D., & Elliott, D. S. (1986) · Journal of Quantitative Criminology · doi:10.1007/bf01064258 · Cited by 717
On the Meaning of within-Factor Correlated Measurement Errors
Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1984) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/208993 · Cited by 526
Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1978) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226739 · Cited by 508
A unified framework of longitudinal models to examine reciprocal relations.
Usami, S., Murayama, K., & Hamaker, E. L. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000210 · Cited by 437
Autoregressive Latent Trajectory (ALT) Models A Synthesis of Two Traditions
Bollen, K. A., & Curran, P. J. (2004) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124103260222 · Cited by 447
Determinants of E-Business Use in U.S. Firms
Hsu, P.-F., Kraemer, K. L., & Dunkle, D. (2006) · International Journal of Electronic Commerce · doi:10.2753/jec1086-4415100401 · Cited by 330
Intraindividual stability of hair cortisol concentrations
Stalder, T., Steudte, S., Miller, R., Skoluda, N., Dettenborn, L., & Kirschbaum, C. (2012) · Psychoneuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2011.08.007 · Cited by 271
Rater bias in performance ratings: Superior, self-, and peer ratings.
Holzbach, R. L. (1978) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.63.5.579 · Cited by 249
Causation issues in structural equation modeling research
Bullock, H. E., Harlow, L. L., & Mulaik, S. A. (1994) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519409539977 · Cited by 237
Perspectives on consumer decision making: an integrated approach
Hansen, T. (2005) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.33 · Cited by 218
van Lier, P. A. C., & Koot, H. M. (2010) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579410000283 · Cited by 215
Danneel, S., Nelemans, S., Spithoven, A., Bastin, M., Bijttebier, P., Colpin, H., Van Den Noortgate, W., Van Leeuwen, K., Verschueren, K., & Goossens, L. (2019) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/s10802-019-00539-0 · Cited by 145
Symptom Dimensions of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales in Psychosis: A Multisite Study
Woodward, T. S., Jung, K., Hwang, H., Yin, J., Taylor, L., Menon, M., Peters, E., Kuipers, E., Waters, F., Lecomte, T., et al. (2014) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbu014 · Cited by 116
The Role of Peer Relationships in the Development of Early School-Age Externalizing Problems
Sturaro, C., van Lier, P. A. C., Cuijpers, P., & Koot, H. M. (2011) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01532.x · Cited by 114
Regression Estimation after Correcting for Attenuation
Fuller, W. A., & Hidiroglou, M. A. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1978.10480011 · Cited by 90
The impact of convenience in a click and collect retail setting: A consumer-based approach
Vyt, D., Jara, M., Mevel, O., Morvan, T., & Morvan, N. (2022) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108491 · Cited by 53
Singh, V., & Sharma, S. K. (2014) · European Transport Research Review · doi:10.1007/s12544-014-0134-4 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- JÖRESKOG, K. G.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1970
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 239-251
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2022631179
- Cited by
- 1,126
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 31.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
