The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Approximate Bayes factors and accounting for model uncertainty in generalised linear models
Abstract
Ways of obtaining approximate Bayes factors for generalised linear models are described, based on the Laplace method for integrals. We propose a new approximation which uses only the output of standard computer programs for estimating generalised linear models, this appears to be quite accurate. A reference set of proper priors is suggested, both to represent the situation where there is not much prior information, and to assess the sensitivity of the results to the prior distribution. The methods can be used when the dispersion parameter is unknown, when there is overdispersion, to compare link functions, and to compare error distributions and variance functions. The methods can be used to implement the Bayesian approach to accounting for model uncertainty. We describe an applciation to inference about relative risks in the presence of control factors where model uncertainty is large and important. Software to implement the methods is available at no cost from StatLib.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Model Selection and Accounting for Model Uncertainty in Graphical Models Using Occam's Window
Madigan, D., & Raftery, A. E. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1994.10476894 · Cited by 1,205 · cited 1×
“The remaining models, which are typically few in number, are said to belong to 'Occam's window' (Madigan & Raftery, 1994).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEFRON, B., & HINKLEY, D. V. (1978) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/65.3.457 · Cited by 952
Berger, J. O., & Delampady, M. (1987) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1177013238 · Cited by 664
Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and Evidence
Berger, J. O., & Sellke, T. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2289131 · Cited by 548
Cited by
Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection
Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2004) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124104268644 · Cited by 11,648
Bayesian model selection in social research
Raftery, A. E. (1995) · Sociological Methodology · doi:10.2307/271063 · Cited by 6,823
Self-citationHoeting, J. A., Madigan, D., Raftery, A. E., & Volinsky, C. T. (1999) · Statistical Science · doi:10.1214/ss/1009212519 · Cited by 4,118
Self-citationGeneralized additive models for location, scale and shape.
Rigby, R. A., & Stasinopoulos, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C: Applied Statistics · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2005.00510.x · Cited by 3,228
Vrieze, S. I. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0027127 · Cited by 1,948
Metadata
- Authors
- Raftery, A.
- Venue
- Biometrika
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1996-06-01
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 251-266
- ISSN
- 0006-3444 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3510
- OpenAlex
- W2074282020
- Cited by
- 633
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 15.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Approximate Bayes factors and accounting for model uncertainty in generalised linear models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/biomet/83.2.251
- The paper
- Raftery, A. (1996). Approximate Bayes factors and accounting for model uncertainty in generalised linear models. Biometrika. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/83.2.251
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.