Cited by 664Statistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceProbability and Statistical ResearchStatistical Methods and Inference

Testing Precise Hypotheses

Open access
Berger, James O., Delampady, Mohan·1987·Statistical Science

Abstract

Testing of precise (point or small interval) hypotheses is reviewed, with special emphasis placed on exploring the dramatic conflict between conditional measures (Bayes factors and posterior probabilities) and the classical P-value (or observed significance level). This conflict is highlighted by finding lower bounds on the conditional measures over wide classes of priors, in normal and binomial situations, lower bounds, which are much larger than the P-value; this leads to the recommendation of several alternatives to P-values. Results are also given concerning the validity of approximating an interval null by a point null. The overall discussion features critical examination of issues such as the probability of objective testing and the possibility of testing from confidence sets.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1214/ss/1177013238

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. BERGER, J. (1986). Are P-values reasonable measures of accuracy. In Pacific Statistical Congress (I. S. Francis et al., eds.). NorthHolland, Amsterdam.
  2. DEMPSTER, A. P. (1971). Model searching and estimation in the logic of inference. In Foundations of Statistical Inference (V. P. Godambe and D. A. Sprott, eds.). Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Toronto.
  3. DEMPSTER, A. P. (1973). The direct use of likelihood for significance testing. In Proc. of the Conference on Foundational Questions in Statistical Inference (O. Barndorff-Nielsen et al., eds.) 335–352. Dept. Theoretical Statistics, Univ. Aarhus.
  4. DICKEY, J. M. (1974). Bayesian alternatives to the F test and least squares estimate in the linear model. In Studies in Bayesian Econometrics and Statistics (S. E. Fienberg and A. Zellner, eds.) 515–554. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  5. DIcKEY, J. M. (1980). Approximate coherence for regression model inference— with a new analysis of Fisher's Broadback Wheatfield example. In Bayesian Analysis in Econometrics and Statistics: Essays in Honor of Harold Jeffreys (A. Zellner, ed.) 333-354. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  6. GooD, I. J. (1985). Weight of evidence: A brief survey. In Bayesian Statistics 2 (J. M. Bernardo, M. H. DeGroot, D. V. Lindley and A. F. M. Smith, eds.) 249–270. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  7. JEFFREYs, H. (1957). Scientific Inference. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
  8. JEFFREYs, H. (1961). Theory of Probability, 3rd ed. Oxford Univ. Press, London.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berger, J. O., & Delampady, M.
Venue
Statistical Science
Published
1987-08-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
317-335
ISSN
  • 0883-4237 (ISSN-L)
  • 2168-8745
OpenAlex
W2128585330
Cited by
664
References
35
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 32 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 22
FWCI
10.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Statistical Science (publishedVersion)
  • Project Euclid (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Probability and Statistical Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
Keywords
point null hypothesis, p-values, Bayes factor, posterior probability, normal distribution, binomial distribution, objective testing, confidence regions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review