Cited by 48Gene expression and cancer classificationStatistical Methods and InferenceBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

Group additive regression models for genomic data analysis

Luan, Y., Li, H.·2008·Biostatistics

Abstract

One important problem in genomic research is to identify genomic features such as gene expression data or DNA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that are related to clinical phenotypes. Often these genomic data can be naturally divided into biologically meaningful groups such as genes belonging to the same pathways or SNPs within genes. In this paper, we propose group additive regression models and a group gradient descent boosting procedure for identifying groups of genomic features that are related to clinical phenotypes. Our simulation results show that by dividing the variables into appropriate groups, we can obtain better identification of the group features that are related to the phenotypes. In addition, the prediction mean square errors are also smaller than the component-wise boosting procedure. We demonstrate the application of the methods to pathway-based analysis of microarray gene expression data of breast cancer. Results from analysis of a breast cancer microarray gene expression data set indicate that the pathways of metalloendopeptidases (MMPs) and MMP inhibitors, as well as cell proliferation, cell growth, and maintenance are important to breast cancer-specific survival.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/biostatistics/kxm015

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ridge regression and LASSO have been considered in genetic association analysis contexts, and other methods have been proposed.

    “Two such techniques, ridge regression74 and the LASSO75,76 have been considered in genetic association analysis contexts, and other methods have also been proposed as well.77–80, 81”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Luan, Y., & Li, H.
Affiliations
  • Shandong University (CN)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Li, H.
Venue
Biostatistics
Published
2007-05-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
100-113
ISSN
  • 1465-4644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-4357
OpenAlex
W2149776317
Cited by
48
References
36
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biostatistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Collection of Biostatistics Research Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (R01ES009911, ES009911)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
gene expression data, single nucleotide polymorphisms, pathway analysis, breast cancer, microarray gene expression, metalloendopeptidase, matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors, cell proliferation, clinical phenotype prediction
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Humans, Models, Genetic, Regression Analysis, Genome, Human, Survival Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Matrix Metalloproteinases, Gene Expression Profiling, Matrix Metalloproteinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review