Cited by 105Anesthesia and Sedative AgentsBiomedical and Chemical ResearchAnesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research

Comparison of changes in electroencephalographic measures during induction of general anaesthesia: influence of the gamma frequency band and electromyogram signal

Open access
Sleigh, J.W., Steyn-Ross, D.A., Steyn-Ross, M.L., Williams, M.L., Smith, P.·2001·British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract

Recent research has shown that high-frequency, gamma-band electroencephalographic (EEG) oscillations (40-60 Hz) may be an important marker of the conscious state. We compared the ability of the bispectral index (BIS) to distinguish the awake and anaesthetized states during the induction of general anaesthesia with: (i) components of the BIS (BetaRatio, SynchFastSlow); (ii) a new EEG variable--the median frequency of the first time derivative of the EEG signal (SE50d); and (iii) the SE50d derived from an EEG signal that has had the frequencies above 30 Hz removed (SE50d(30Hz)). Two groups of subjects were studied: (i) nine volunteers undergoing a short propofol infusion until loss of response to verbal command, and (ii) 84 patients undergoing routine anaesthesia for a variety of surgical procedures. In the volunteer group, the changes in the BetaRatio and SE50d were comparable with changes in the BIS. The changes in the SE50d(30Hz) were less consistent. In the patient group, the BIS components were equivalent to the BIS in separating the awake from the surgically anaesthetized states (area under receiver operating curve: BIS 0.95, SE50d 0.95, BetaRatio 0.96). Using the submental electromyogram (EMG) signal to estimate the frontalis EMG (30-47 Hz) signal, the changes in EMG signal were, on average, about one-tenth the magnitude of the EEG. We conclude that: (i) there exist simpler derived EEG variables that are similar in accuracy to the BIS; (ii) it is important to avoid filtering out the EEG frequencies above 30 Hz; and (iii) in most patients the confounding effects of the frontalis EMG on the EEG are minimal.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bja/86.1.50

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The cognition-related frequencies are mainly below 30 Hz, and EEG beyond these frequency bands is easily confused with the electromyogram (EMG).

    “In addition, the cognition-related frequencies are mainly below 30 Hz (Chikhi et al. 2022), and EEG beyond these frequency bands is easily confused with the electromyogram (EMG) (Sleigh et al. 2001).”

    From Changes in Mental Health and EEG Biomarkers of Undergraduates Under Different Patterns of Mindfulness (2024) · cites this paper as Sleigh et al. 2001

    Only the EMG clause is attributed to Sleigh et al.; the below-30-Hz cognition claim cites Chikhi et al. The EMG influence section says the 30–47 Hz EEG component is susceptible to EMG interference, but the Discussion says EMG was a minor component of the observed scalp EEG in about 90% of patients. Thus, describing EEG above 30 Hz as generally 'easily confused' with EMG overstates the finding. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Plourde G. Evoked potentials and 40-Hz oscillations. Anesthesiology 1999; 91: 1187±9 20
  2. Clark DL, Rosner BS. Neurophysiological effects of general anaesthetics. I. The electroencephalogram and sensory evoked responses in man. Anesthesiology 1973; 38: 564±82 22

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sleigh, J. W., Steyn-Ross, D. A., Steyn-Ross, M. L., Williams, M. L., & Smith, P.
Affiliations
Waikato Hospital (NZ)
Corresponding author
Sleigh, J.W.
Venue
British Journal of Anaesthesia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-01
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
50-58
ISSN
0007-0912 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005165101
Cited by
105
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Biomedical and Chemical Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Keywords
general anaesthesia induction, bispectral index, propofol, loss of consciousness, EEG filtering, depth of anesthesia monitoring
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Consciousness, Electroencephalography, Electromyography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Propofol, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Anesthetics, General, Anesthetics, Intravenous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review