Cited by 8Education and Military IntegrationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental Health

Discharge, But No Exit: An Existential Qualitative Interpretive Meta-Synthesis of Veteran Reintegration

Tarbet, Zachary, Moore, Steven, Alanazi, Ahmed·2021·The British Journal of Social Work

Abstract

Ongoing campaigns in support of the Global War on Terrorism have created an influx of veterans attempting to reintegrate into civilian society. While some veterans reintegrate easily, others continue to struggle. An increasing number of studies have begun to take a more holistic approach to understanding the root causes of the distress observed in reintegrating veterans. The objective of this study was to utilise the existential framework as conceptualised by Irvin Yalom to generate a deeper understanding of the underlying factors contributing to the struggles that veterans experience in their return to society. A qualitative interpretive meta-synthesis (QIMS) approach was used to hear the combined voices of a selection of veterans from the USA and UK. A directed content analysis was used in conjunction with the QIMS methodology to categorise novel constructs in the context of existential ultimate concerns resulting in nine new themes: loss of identity, fear of death, loss of control, reliance on authority, feelings of alienation, self-isolation, resentment towards civilians, loss of collective sense of duty and loss of purpose. Findings enhance the understanding of conflicting values and beliefs underlying reintegration problems, informing future social work practice and research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/bjsw/bcaa133

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tarbet, Z., Moore, S., & Alanazi, A.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
Corresponding author
Tarbet, Zachary
Venue
The British Journal of Social Work
Published
2020-09-27
Volume
51
Issue
8
Pages
3319-3339
ISSN
  • 0045-3102 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-263X
OpenAlex
W3090591481
Cited by
8
References
39
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 4
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The British Journal of Social Work (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
Keywords
veteran reintegration, post-9/11 veterans, war on terror, existential concerns, identity loss, fear of death, loss of control, alienation, self-isolation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review