Cited by 255Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchResilience and Mental HealthTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The role of coping, resilience, and social support in mediating the relation between PTSD and social functioning in veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan

Tsai, Jack, Harpaz-Rotem, Ilan, Pietrzak, Robert H., Southwick, Steven M.·2012·Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders among veterans returning from Iraq and Afghanistan. Little research has examined variables that may mediate the relation between PTSD and aspects of social functioning, such as relationship satisfaction and family functioning. In this cross-sectional study, a total of 164 veterans who were seeking VA primary care or mental health care within one year after returning from Iraq and/or Afghanistan were screened for PTSD and completed a series of questionnaires that assessed social functioning, coping, and life satisfaction. Results showed that the 86 (52%) veterans who screened positive for PTSD reported greater difficulties in their relationships with romantic partners, less cohesion in their families, less social support, poorer social functioning, and lower life satisfaction compared to other treatment-seeking veterans. Less social support from the community, excessive worry, decreased acceptance of change, and lower availability of secure relationships mediated the association between PTSD and poor social functioning. The relation between PTSD and lower partner satisfaction was mediated by greater cognitive social avoidance and lower availability of secure relationships. These results suggest that psychotherapeutic interventions that address these mediating variables may help improve social functioning in treatment-seeking veterans with PTSD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/psyc.2012.75.2.135

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsai, J., Harpaz-Rotem, I., Pietrzak, R. H., & Southwick, S. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes
Published
2012-06
Volume
75
Issue
2
Pages
135-149
ISSN
0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116019447
Cited by
255
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 2
FWCI
18.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, veterans, Iraq and Afghanistan veterans, social functioning, coping, resilience, social support, relationship satisfaction, family functioning, life satisfaction, war trauma
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Afghanistan, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Family Relations, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Iraq, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Social Behavior, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Veterans, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Resilience, Psychological, Afghan Campaign 2001-, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review