The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE ANATOMY OF PHONOLOGICAL AND SEMANTIC PROCESSING IN NORMAL SUBJECTS
Abstract
We assessed brain activation of nine normal right-handed volunteers in a positron emission tomography study designed to differentiate the functional anatomy of the two major components of auditory comprehension of language, namely phonological versus lexico-semantic processing. The activation paradigm included three tasks. In the reference task, subjects were asked to detect rising pitch within a series of pure tones. In the phonological task, they had to monitor the sequential phonemic organization of non-words. In the lexico-semantic task, they monitored concrete nouns according to semantic criteria. We found highly significant and different patterns of activation. Phonological processing was associated with activation in the left superior temporal gyrus (mainly Wernicke's area) and, to a lesser extent, in Broca's area and in the right superior temporal regions. Lexico-semantic processing was associated with activity in the left middle and inferior temporal gyri, the left inferior parietal region and the left superior prefrontal region, in addition to the superior temporal regions. A comparison of the pattern of activation obtained with the lexico-semantic task to that obtained with the phonological task was made in order to account for the contribution of lower stage components to semantic processing. No difference in activation was found in Broca's area and superior temporal areas which suggests that these areas are activated by the phonological component of both tasks, but activation was noted in the temporal, parietal and frontal multi-modal association areas. These constitute parts of a large network that represent the specific anatomic substrate of the lexico-semantic processing of language.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–108 of 108
Multistable representation of speech forms: a functional MRI study of verbal transformations.
Sato, M., Baciu, M., Lœvenbruck, H., Schwartz, J.-L., Cathiard, M.-A., Segebarth, C., & Abry, C. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.055 · Cited by 78
The integration of prosodic speech in high functioning autism: a preliminary FMRI study
Hesling, I., Dilharreguy, B., Peppé, S., Amirault, M., Bouvard, M., & Allard, M. (2010) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0011571 · Cited by 67
Dien, J., Brian, E. S., Molfese, D. L., & Gold, B. T. (2013) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2013.03.008 · Cited by 59
fMRI correlates of retrieval orientation
HORNBERGER, M., RUGG, M., & HENSON, R. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.12.009 · Cited by 54
Crosson, B., Cato, M. A., Sadek, J. R., Gökçay, D., Bauer, R. M., Fischler, I. S., Maron, L., Gopinath, K., Auerbach, E. J., Browd, S. R., et al. (2002) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617702801394 · Cited by 49
McNorgan, C., Randazzo-Wagner, M., & Booth, J. R. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00388 · Cited by 46
Functional activation studies of word processing in the recovery from aphasia
Zahn, R., Schwarz, M., & Huber, W. (2006) · Journal of Physiology-Paris · doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.013 · Cited by 27
Cerebral functional asymmetry and phonological performance in dyslexic adults
Hernandez, N., Andersson, F., Edjlali, M., Hommet, C., Cottier, J. P., Destrieux, C., & Bonnet‐Brilhault, F. (2013) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12141 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- DÉMONET, J.-F., CHOLLET, F., RAMSAY, S., CARDEBAT, D., NESPOULOUS, J.-L., WISE, R., RASCOL, A., & FRACKOWIAK, R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1753-1768
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2136100138
- Cited by
- 1,154
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.