The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Riddoch syndrome: insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision
Abstract
We have studied a patient, G.Y., who was rendered hemianopic following a lesion affecting the primary visual cortex (area VI), sustained 31 years ago, with the hope of characterizing his ability to discriminate visual stimuli presented in his blind field, both psychophysically and in terms of the brain activity revealed by imaging methods. Our results show that (i) there is a correlation between G.Y.'s capacity to discriminate stimuli presented in his blind field and his conscious awareness of the same stimuli and (ii) that G.Y.'s performance on some tasks is characterized by a marked variability, both in terms of his awareness for a given level of discrimination and in his discrimination for a given level of awareness. The observations on G.Y., and a comparison of his capacities with those of normal subjects, leads us to propose a simple model of the relationship between visual discrimination and awareness. This supposes that the two independent capacities are very tightly coupled in normal subjects (gnosopsia) and that the effect of a VI lesion is to uncouple them, but only slightly. This uncoupling leads to two symmetrical departures, on the one hand to gnosanopsia (awareness without discrimination) and on the other to agnosopsia (discrimination without awareness). Our functional MRI studies show that V5 is always active when moving stimuli, whether slow or fast, are presented to his blind field and that the activity in V5 co-varies with less intense activity in other cortical areas. The difference in cerebral activity between gnosopsia and agnosopsia is that, in the latter, the activity in V5 is less intense and lower statistical thresholds are required to demonstrate it. Direct comparison of the brain activity during individual 'aware' and 'unaware' trials, corrected for the confounding effects of motion, has also allowed us, for the first time, to titrate conscious awareness against brain activity and show that there is a straightforward relationship between awareness and activity, both in individual cortical areas, in this case area V5, and in the reticular activating system. The imaging evidence, together with the variability in his levels of awareness and discrimination, manifested in his capacity to discriminate consciously on some occasions and unconsciously on others, leads us to conclude that agnosopsia, gnosopsia and gnosanopsia are all manifestations of a single condition which we call the Riddoch syndrome, in deference to the British neurologist who, in 1917, first characterized the major aspect of this disability. We discuss the significance of these results in relation to historical views about the organization of the visual brain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Detecting activations in PET and fMRI: levels of inference and power
Friston, K. J., Holmes, A., Poline, J.-B., Price, C. J., & Frith, C. D. (1996) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1996.0074 · Cited by 1,148 · cited 2×
“…different experimental conditions were assessed at each voxel using the general linear model and theory of Gaussian fields (Friston et al., 1995a), modelling the haemodynamic response function as a 6 s delayed boxcar and assessing significance with a cluster-level analysis (Friston et al., 1996).”
Girard, P., Salin, P. A., & Bullier, J. (1992) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1992.67.6.1437 · Cited by 216
Residual Vision in a Scotoma: Implications for Blindsight
Fendrich, R., Wessinger, C. M., & Gazzaniga, M. S. (1992) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1439839 · Cited by 204
Cited by
Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness: basic evidence and a workspace framework
Dehaene, S. (2001) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00123-2 · Cited by 2,498
Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience
Block, N. (2007) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x07002786 · Cited by 1,146
Kawabata, H., & Zeki, S. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00696.2003 · Cited by 880
Self-citationFast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness
Pascual-Leone, A., & Walsh, V. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1057099 · Cited by 761
Two neural correlates of consciousness
Block, N. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2004.12.006 · Cited by 713
Metadata
- Authors
- Zeki, S.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-45
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2136792723
- Cited by
- 420
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 10.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Riddoch syndrome: insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/121.1.25
- The paper
- Zeki, S. (1998). The Riddoch syndrome: insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.1.25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.