The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The pathophysiology of primary dystonia
Abstract
Co-contraction and overflow of EMG activity of inappropriate muscles are typical features of all dystonic movements whether voluntary or involuntary. Voluntary movements are slow and more variable than normal, and there is particular difficulty switching between component movements of a complex task. Reduced spinal cord and brainstem inhibition is common to many reflex studies (long-latency reflexes, cranial reflexes and reciprocal inhibition). These reflex abnormalities may contribute to the difficulties in voluntary movements but cannot be causal as they can occur outside the clinically involved territory. Clinical and neurophysiological studies have emphasized the possible role of sensory feedback in the generation of dystonic movements. Abnormalities of cortical and basal ganglia function have been described in functional imaging and neurophysiological studies of patients with dystonia and in animal models of primary dystonia. Studies of cortical function have shown reduced preparatory activity in the EEG before the onset of voluntary movements, whilst magnetic brain stimulation has revealed changes in motor cortical excitability. Functional imaging of the brain in primary dystonia has suggested reduced pallidal inhibition of the thalamus with consequent overactivity of medial and prefrontal cortical areas and underactivity of the primary motor cortex during movements. These findings are supported by preliminary neuronal recordings from the globus pallidus and the thalamus at the time of stereotaxic surgery in patients with dystonia. All this evidence suggests that primary dystonia results from a functional disturbance of the basal ganglia, particularly in the striatal control of the globus pallidus (and substantia nigra pars reticulata). This causes altered thalamic control of cortical motor planning and executive areas, and abnormal regulation of brainstem and spinal cord inhibitory interneuronal mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Alcaro, A., Huber, R., & Panksepp, J. (2007) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2007.07.014 · Cited by 616
The pathophysiological basis of dystonias
Breakefield, X. O., Blood, A. J., Li, Y., Hallett, M., Hanson, P. I., & Standaert, D. G. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2337 · Cited by 448
Deep Brain Stimulation for Neurologic and Neuropsychiatric Disorders
Wichmann, T., & DeLong, M. R. (2006) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.022 · Cited by 331
Dystonia as a network disorder: What is the role of the cerebellum?
Prudente, C. N., Hess, E. J., & Jinnah, H. A. (2014) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2013.11.062 · Cited by 262
Movement disorders induced by antipsychotic drugs: implications of the CATIE schizophrenia trial.
Caroff, S. N., Hurford, I., Lybrand, J., & Campbell, E. C. (2011) · Neurologic Clinics · doi:10.1016/j.ncl.2010.10.002 · Cited by 188
Metadata
- Authors
- Berardelli, A.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-07-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1195-1212
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2118225192
- Cited by
- 831
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 17.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The pathophysiology of primary dystonia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/121.7.1195
- The paper
- Berardelli, A. (1998). The pathophysiology of primary dystonia. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.7.1195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.