The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phantom movements and pain An fMRI study in upper limb amputees
Open accessAbstract
Using functional MRI, we investigated 14 upper limb amputees and seven healthy controls during the execution of hand and lip movements and imagined movements of the phantom limb or left hand. Only patients with phantom limb pain showed a shift of the lip representation into the deafferented primary motor and somatosensory hand areas during lip movements. Displacement of the lip representation in the primary motor and somatosensory cortex was positively correlated to the amount of phantom limb pain. Thalamic activation was only present during executed movements in the healthy controls. The cerebellum showed no evidence of reorganizational changes. In amputees, movement of the intact hand showed a level of activation similar to movement of the right dominant hand in the healthy controls. During imagination of moving the phantom hand, all patients showed significantly higher activation in the contralateral primary motor and somatosensory cortices compared with imagination of hand movements in the controls. In the patients with phantom limb pain but not the pain-free amputees, imagined movement of the phantom hand activated the neighbouring face area. These data suggest selective coactivation of the cortical hand and mouth areas in patients with phantom limb pain. This reorganizational change may be the neural correlate of phantom limb pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory
Oldfield, R. C. (1971) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4 · Cited by 35,900
Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors
(1996) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1996.0058 · Cited by 1,246
Lotze, M., Montoya, P., Erb, M., Hülsmann, E., Flor, H., Klose, U., Birbaumer, N., & Grodd, W. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892999563553 · Cited by 993
Self-citationPhantom limbs and the concept of a neuromatrix
Melzack, R. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90179-e · Cited by 808
Do imagined and executed actions share the same neural substrate?
Decety, J. (1996) · Cognitive Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0926-6410(95)00033-x · Cited by 643
Some proprioceptive influences on the perceptual representation of body shape and orientation.
LACKNER, J. R. (1988) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/111.2.281 · Cited by 500
Cited by
Repairing the human brain after stroke: I. Mechanisms of spontaneous recovery
Cramer, S. C. (2008) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.21393 · Cited by 875
Chapman, C. R., & Vierck, C. J. (2017) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2016.11.004 · Cited by 423
Neugebauer, V., Galhardo, V., Maione, S., & Mackey, S. C. (2009) · Brain Research Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.brainresrev.2008.12.014 · Cited by 353
Intra- and Inter-subject Variability in EEG-Based Sensorimotor Brain Computer Interface: A Review
Saha, S., & Baumert, M. (2020) · Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fncom.2019.00087 · Cited by 325
Soler, M. D., Kumru, H., Pelayo, R., Vidal, J., Tormos, J. M., Fregni, F., Navarro, X., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2010) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awq184 · Cited by 308
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotze, M.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 124
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2268-2277
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2150230308
- Cited by
- 445
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 8.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phantom movements and pain An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/124.11.2268
- The paper
- Lotze, M. (2001). Phantom movements and pain An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/124.11.2268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.