Timing is everything: tau imaging across stages of Alzheimer’s disease
Open accessAbstract
This scientific commentary refers to ‘18F-MK-6240 PET for early and late detection of neurofibrillary tangles’, by Pascoal et al. (doi:10.1093/brain/awaa180).
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Tau-PET provides information beyond other imaging modalities or fluid biomarkers, including in vivo assessment of Braak stages indicating tau pathology progression.
“Furthermore, tau‐PET provides information beyond what can be captured by other imaging modalities or fluid biomarkers, including in vivo assessment of Braak stages, which indicates the progression of tau pathology throughout the brain. 17 , 18”
From Machine learning prediction of tau‐PET in Alzheimer's disease using plasma, MRI, and clinical data (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
The main text (page unavailable) describes in vivo Braak staging with tau PET and suggests it may offer advantages over MRI and amyloid PET. It does not compare tau PET with fluid biomarkers. It also cautions that the study was cross-sectional and that tracking progression through Braak stages over time remains to be confirmed. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredTau-PET provides information beyond what can be captured by other imaging modalities or fluid biomarkers, including in vivo assessment of Braak stages, which indicates the progression of tau pathology throughout the brain.
“Furthermore, tau‐PET provides information beyond what can be captured by other imaging modalities or fluid biomarkers, including in vivo assessment of Braak stages, which indicates the progression of tau pathology throughout the brain. 17 , 18”
From Machine learning prediction of tau‐PET in Alzheimer's disease using plasma, MRI, and clinical data (2025) · cites this paper as [18]
The commentary (page not provided) says tau PET can stage tau deposition in vivo and that its regional pattern recapitulates the spread of pathology across Braak stages. It also suggests an advantage over MRI and amyloid PET, but does not compare tau PET with fluid biomarkers. Because the study discussed was cross-sectional, the commentary says tracking progression within individuals over time still needs confirmation. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Neuropathological stageing of Alzheimer-related changes.
Braak, H., & Braak, E. (1991) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/bf00308809 · Cited by 16,123 · see citing works
Prevalence of Cerebral Amyloid Pathology in Persons Without Dementia: A Meta-analysis
Jansen, W. J., Ossenkoppele, R., Knol, D. L., Tijms, B. M., Scheltens, P., Verhey, F. R. J., Visser, P. J., Aalten, P., Aarsland, D., Alcolea, D., et al. (2015) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2015.4668 · Cited by 1,610 · see citing works
Primary age-related tauopathy (PART): a common pathology associated with human aging
Crary, J. F., Trojanowski, J. Q., Schneider, J. A., Abisambra, J. F., Abner, E. L., Alafuzoff, I., Arnold, S. E., Attems, J., Beach, T. G., Bigio, E. H., et al. (2014) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s00401-014-1349-0 · Cited by 1,467 · see citing works
Tau PET imaging in neurodegenerative tauopathies—still a challenge
Leuzy, A., Chiotis, K., Lemoine, L., Gillberg, P.-G., Almkvist, O., Rodriguez-Vieitez, E., & Nordberg, A. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0342-8 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Alzheimer's disease drug development pipeline: 2017
Cummings, J., Lee, G., Mortsdorf, T., Ritter, A., & Zhong, K. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2017.05.002 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Imaging tau and amyloid-β proteinopathies in Alzheimer disease and other conditions
Villemagne, V. L., Doré, V., Burnham, S. C., Masters, C. L., & Rowe, C. C. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2018.9 · Cited by 440 · see citing works
Schwarz, A. J., Yu, P., Miller, B. B., Shcherbinin, S., Dickson, J., Navitsky, M., Joshi, A. D., Devous, M. D., & Mintun, M. S. (2016) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aww023 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Hostetler, E. D., Walji, A. M., Zeng, Z., Miller, P. J., Bennacef, I., Salinas, C. A., Connolly, B., Gantert, L. T., Haley, H., Holahan, M. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Nuclear Medicine · doi:10.2967/jnumed.115.171678 · Cited by 275 · see citing works
A European multicentre PET study of fibrillar amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease
Nordberg, A., Carter, S. F., Rinne, J., Drzezga, A., Brooks, D. J., Vandenberghe, R., Perani, D., Forsberg, A., Långström, B., Scheinin, N., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging · doi:10.1007/s00259-012-2237-2 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [9]9. Pascoal TA, Therriault J, Benedet AL, Savard M, Lussier FZ, Chamoun M, et al. 18F- MK-6240 PET for early and late detection of neurofibrillary tangles. Brain 2020; 143: 2818-30.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vanderlinden, G., Ceccarini, J., Vande Casteele, T., Michiels, L., Lemmens, R., Triau, E., Serdons, K., Tournoy, J., Koole, M., Vandenbulcke, M., et al. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01672-x · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Machine learning prediction of tau‐PET in Alzheimer's disease using plasma, MRI, and clinical data
Karlsson, L., Vogel, J., Arvidsson, I., Åström, K., Strandberg, O., Seidlitz, J., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Stomrud, E., Ossenkoppele, R., Ashton, N. J., et al. (2025) · Alzheimer's & Dementia · doi:10.1002/alz.14600 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Pathological Mechanisms and Molecular Imaging Advances in Alzheimer’s Disease
Liu, C., Meng, Y., Liu, R., Wang, Z., & Zhao, H. (2025) · Clinical Interventions in Aging · doi:10.2147/cia.s534015 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Duan, Y., Fu, Y., Wu, Z., Zheng, W., Lv, G., Chen, L., Wu, J., Han, Z., Dai, Q., Gu, Q., et al. (2026) · Brain Health · doi:10.1002/brh2.70008
- Authors
- Forsberg Morén, A., & Varrone, A.
- Affiliations
- Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Centre for Psychiatry Research, Karolinska Institutet and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
- Region Stockholm (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Varrone, Andrea
- ORCID
- Varrone, Andrea
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- Volume
- 143
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2634-2636
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W3087501654
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model (vor)
- Locations
- Brain (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- tau PET imaging, [18F]MK-6240, neurofibrillary tangles, Alzheimer's disease, disease staging, early detection, amyloid imaging
- MeSH terms
- Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Isoquinolines, Neurofibrillary Tangles, tau Proteins, Positron-Emission Tomography
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review