The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The time course of epidermal nerve fibre regeneration: studies in normal controls and in people with diabetes, with and without neuropathy
Open accessAbstract
We sought to develop and validate a standardized cutaneous nerve regeneration model and to define the rate of epidermal nerve fibre (ENF) regeneration first in healthy control subjects and then in neuropathic and neuropathy-free subjects with diabetes. Next, we assessed the effect of different factors on the rate of nerve fibre regeneration and investigated whether such an approach might offer insight into novel trial designs and outcome measures. All subjects had a standardized topical capsaicin dressing applied to the distal lateral thigh. ENF densities derived from skin biopsies were determined at baseline, after capsaicin treatment and at reinnervation time points. For each subject, the best fit line from post-denervation data was determined and the slope was used as the rate of regeneration. In healthy control subjects, regeneration was correlated with psychophysical sensory testing, electron microscopy studies and immunohistochemistry with alternative axonal membrane markers. Topical capsaicin application produced complete or nearly complete denervation of the epidermis in both control subjects and people with diabetes. The rate of regeneration was associated with the baseline ENF density (P < 0.001), but not age (P = 0.75), gender (P = 0.18), epidermal thickness (P = 0.4) or post-capsaicin treatment density (P = 0.7). ENF regeneration, as determined by recovery of ENF density, occurred at a rate of 0.177 +/- 0.075 fibres/mm/day in healthy control subjects and was significantly reduced in subjects with diabetes (0.074 +/- 0.064, P < 0.001) after adjusting for changes in baseline ENF density. Among subjects with diabetes, the presence of neuropathy was associated with a further reduction in regenerative rate (0.10 +/- 0.07 versus 0.04 +/- 0.03, P = 0.03), though diabetes type (P = 0.7), duration of diabetes (P = 0.3) or baseline glycated haemoglobin (P = 0.6) were not significant. These results have several implications. First, topical capsaicin application can produce a uniform epidermal nerve fibre injury that is safe and well tolerated, and offers an efficient strategy to measure and study nerve regeneration in man. Secondly, using our techniques, reduced rates of nerve regeneration were found in people with diabetes without evidence of neuropathy and indicate that abnormalities in peripheral nerve function are present early in diabetes, before signs or symptoms develop. These results suggest that regenerative neuropathy trials could include non-neuropathic subjects and that trial duration can be dramatically shortened.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The spectrum of neuropathy in diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance
Sumner, C. J., Sheth, S., Griffin, J. W., Cornblath, D. R., & Polydefkis, M. (2003) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.60.1.108 · Cited by 708 · cited 1×
“Lastly, these ®bres are clinically relevant as they are implicated in many types of painful neuropathy such as those associated with human immunode®ciency virus (HIV) infection, diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance (McCarthy et al., 1995; Kennedy et al., 1996; Kennedy, 1996; Smith et al., 2001; Sumner et a…”
BackgroundSelf-citationEpidermal nerve innervation in impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes-associated neuropathy
Smith, A. G., Ramachandran, P., Tripp, S., & Singleton, J. R. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.9.1701 · Cited by 235
Cited by
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Pharmacotherapy
Iqbal, Z., Azmi, S., Yadav, R., Ferdousi, M., Kumar, M., Cuthbertson, D. J., Lim, J., Malik, R. A., & Alam, U. (2018) · Clinical Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2018.04.001 · Cited by 487
Mechanism of diabetic neuropathy: Where are we now and where to go?
Yagihashi, S., Mizukami, H., & Sugimoto, K. (2011) · Journal of Diabetes Investigation · doi:10.1111/j.2040-1124.2010.00070.x · Cited by 488
Grayston, R., Czanner, G., Elhadd, K., Goebel, A., Frank, B., Üçeyler, N., Malik, R. A., & Alam, U. (2019) · Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism · doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.08.003 · Cited by 213
Randomized control trial of topical clonidine for treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy
Campbell, C. M., Kipnes, M. S., Stouch, B. C., Brady, K. L., Kelly, M., Schmidt, W. K., Petersen, K. L., Rowbotham, M. C., & Campbell, J. N. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2012.04.014 · Cited by 165
Treating pain in diabetic neuropathy: current and developmental drugs
Alam, U., Sloan, G., & Tesfaye, S. (2020) · Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40265-020-01259-2 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Polydefkis, M., Hauer, P., Sheth, S., Sirdofsky, M., Griffin, J. W., & McArthur, J. C.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-07
- Volume
- 127
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1606-1615
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W1981047340
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The time course of epidermal nerve fibre regeneration: studies in normal controls and in people with diabetes, with and without neuropathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awh175
- The paper
- Polydefkis, M., Hauer, P., Sheth, S., Sirdofsky, M., Griffin, J. W., & McArthur, J. C. (2004). The time course of epidermal nerve fibre regeneration: studies in normal controls and in people with diabetes, with and without neuropathy. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh175
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.