Cited by 222Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

A new focal EAE model of cortical demyelination: Multiple sclerosis-like lesions with rapid resolution of inflammation and extensive remyelination

Merkler, D.·2006·Brain

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed widespread demyelination in the cortex of patients with chronic multiple sclerosis. In contrast to white matter lesions, cortical multiple sclerosis lesions are accompanied by only minor inflammation. Research into the pathogenesis of cortical lesion formation has been hampered by the fact that the conventional rodent model of multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), does not regularly affect the cortex. To overcome this limitation we developed a new rat model of cortical multiple sclerosis. Lesions were stereotactically targeted to the cerebral cortex by injection of pro-inflammatory mediators in animals that were immunized subclinically with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG). We thus generated highly reproducible demyelinated lesions in the neocortex with remarkable histological similarities to cortical multiple sclerosis lesions. The focal cortical EAE model led to the typical pattern of intracortical and subpial demyelination, infiltration with inflammatory cells, complement deposition, acute axonal damage and neuronal cell death. Surprisingly, extensive cortical inflammation largely resolved within 2 weeks. Furthermore, cortical demyelination was readily compensated by rapid remyelination. Our data thus suggest that cortical inflammation is a transient phenomenon, and that remyelination of cortical inflammatory-demyelinating lesions may occur rapidly.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awl135

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Merkler, D.
Affiliations
University of Göttingen (DE)
Corresponding author
Merkler, D.
Venue
Brain
Published
2006-07-01
Volume
129
Issue
8
Pages
1972-1983
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2155221060
Cited by
222
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 14
FWCI
10.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • GRO (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
cortical demyelination, multiple sclerosis, experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, rat model, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein, stereotactic injection, remyelination, cortical inflammation, complement deposition, axonal injury, neuronal cell death
MeSH terms
Animals, Cerebral Cortex, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalomyelitis, Autoimmune, Experimental, Female, Multiple Sclerosis, Myelin Proteins, Myelin Sheath, Rats, Inbred Lew, Remission, Spontaneous, Stereotaxic Techniques, Cytokines, Inflammation Mediators, Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein, Rats, Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review