Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 431

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Phenotypical and functional characterization of T helper 17 cells in multiple sclerosis

Brucklacher-Waldert, Verena, Stuerner, Klarissa, Kolster, Manuela, Wolthausen, Julia, Tolosa, Eva·2009·Brain

Abstract

Multiple sclerosis is a T cell-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. Interleukin-17-producing T helper cells, named Th17 cells, represent a novel CD4+ T cell effector subset involved in the response against extracellular pathogens. In addition, Th17 cells are pathogenic in several animal models of autoimmune disease, including the animal model for multiple sclerosis, but their function in multiple sclerosis remains to be elucidated. In this study, we analysed the frequency and the phenotype of Th17 cells in the cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood of multiple sclerosis patients. We show that the frequency of Th17 cells is significantly higher in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis during relapse, in comparison to relapsing-remitting patients in remission or to patients with other non-inflammatory neurological diseases. Similarly, in patients with clinically isolated syndrome during their first neurological episode, Th17 cells are more abundant than in clinically isolated syndrome patients with no acute symptoms. Patients with inflammatory neurological diseases other than multiple sclerosis also showed increased frequency of Th17 cells compared to patients with no inflammatory diseases. To assess a potential pathological impact of Th17 cells in disease, we generated T cell clones from the cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral blood of patients with multiple sclerosis. We found that Th17 clones expressed higher basal levels of the activation markers CD5, CD69, CD2 and human leukocyte antigen-DR as well as of the CD28-related family of co-stimulatory molecules, when compared to Th1 clones, and confirmed these findings with ex vivo human T cells. Molecules involved in T cell adhesion to endothelium, such as CD49d, CD6 and the melanoma cell adhesion molecule, were also more abundant on the Th17 than on the Th1 cells. Furthermore, functional assays showed that Th17 clones were more prone than Th1 clones to melanoma cell adhesion molecule-mediated adhesion to endothelial cells, and that Th17 cells had a higher proliferative capacity and were less susceptible to suppression than Th1 cells. Altogether our data suggest that Th17 cells display a high pathogenic potential and may constitute a relevant pathogenic subset in multiple sclerosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awp289

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 43 references

Cited by

See all 431

Metadata

Authors
Brucklacher-Waldert, V., Stuerner, K., Kolster, M., Wolthausen, J., & Tolosa, E.
Venue
Brain
Published
2009-11-23
Volume
132
Issue
12
Pages
3329-3341
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2116686907
Cited by
431
References
43
FWCI
12.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phenotypical and functional characterization of T helper 17 cells in multiple sclerosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awp289
The paper
Brucklacher-Waldert, V., Stuerner, K., Kolster, M., Wolthausen, J., & Tolosa, E. (2009). Phenotypical and functional characterization of T helper 17 cells in multiple sclerosis. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awp289

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.