Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Magnetic resonance imaging pattern recognition in hypomyelinating disorders

Open access
Steenweg, Marjan E., Vanderver, Adeline, Blaser, Susan, Bizzi, Alberto, de Koning, Tom J., Mancini, Grazia M. S., van Wieringen, Wessel N., Barkhof, Frederik, Wolf, Nicole I., van der Knaap, Marjo S.·2010·Brain

Abstract

Hypomyelination is observed in the context of a growing number of genetic disorders that share clinical characteristics. The aim of this study was to determine the possible role of magnetic resonance imaging pattern recognition in distinguishing different hypomyelinating disorders, which would facilitate the diagnostic process. Only patients with hypomyelination of known cause were included in this retrospective study. A total of 112 patients with Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease, hypomyelination with congenital cataract, hypomyelination with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and hypodontia, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease, infantile GM1 and GM2 gangliosidosis, Salla disease and fucosidosis were included. The brain scans were rated using a standard scoring list; the raters were blinded to the diagnoses. Grouping of the patients was based on cluster analysis. Ten clusters of patients with similar magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities were identified. The most important discriminating items were early cerebellar atrophy, homogeneity of the white matter signal on T(2)-weighted images, abnormal signal intensity of the basal ganglia, signal abnormalities in the pons and additional T(2) lesions in the deep white matter. Eight clusters each represented mainly a single disorder (i.e. Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease, hypomyelination with congenital cataract, hypomyelination with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and hypodontia, infantile GM1 and GM2 gangliosidosis, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease and fucosidosis); only two clusters contained multiple diseases. Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease was divided between two clusters and Salla disease did not cluster at all. This study shows that it is possible to separate patients with hypomyelination disorders of known cause in clusters based on magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities alone. In most cases of Pelizaeus-Merzbacher disease, hypomyelination with congenital cataract, hypomyelination with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism and hypodontia, Pelizaeus-Merzbacher-like disease, infantile GM1 and GM2 gangliosidosis and fucosidosis, the imaging pattern gives clues for the diagnosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awq257

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Steenweg, M. E., Vanderver, A., Blaser, S., Bizzi, A., de Koning, T. J., Mancini, G. M. S., van Wieringen, W. N., Barkhof, F., Wolf, N. I., & van der Knaap, M. S.
Venue
Brain
Published
2010-09-27
Volume
133
Issue
10
Pages
2971-2982
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2157328578
Cited by
288
References
1
FWCI
9.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Magnetic resonance imaging pattern recognition in hypomyelinating disorders. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awq257
The paper
Steenweg, M. E., Vanderver, A., Blaser, S., Bizzi, A., de Koning, T. J., Mancini, G. M. S., van Wieringen, W. N., Barkhof, F., Wolf, N. I., & van der Knaap, M. S. (2010). Magnetic resonance imaging pattern recognition in hypomyelinating disorders. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq257

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.