The DOI matches its Crossref record; 122 of the 122 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches
Open accessAbstract
The motor system comprises a network of cortical and subcortical areas interacting via excitatory and inhibitory circuits, thereby governing motor behaviour. The balance within the motor network may be critically disturbed after stroke when the lesion either directly affects any of these areas or damages-related white matter tracts. A growing body of evidence suggests that abnormal interactions among cortical regions remote from the ischaemic lesion might also contribute to the motor impairment after stroke. Here, we review recent studies employing models of functional and effective connectivity on neuroimaging data to investigate how stroke influences the interaction between motor areas and how changes in connectivity relate to impaired motor behaviour and functional recovery. Based on such data, we suggest that pathological intra- and inter-hemispheric interactions among key motor regions constitute an important pathophysiological aspect of motor impairment after subcortical stroke. We also demonstrate that therapeutic interventions, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, which aims to interfere with abnormal cortical activity, may correct pathological connectivity not only at the stimulation site but also among distant brain regions. In summary, analyses of connectivity further our understanding of the pathophysiology underlying motor symptoms after stroke, and may thus help to design hypothesis-driven treatment strategies to promote recovery of motor function in patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700
Neuronal Oscillations in Cortical Networks
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1099745 · Cited by 6,576
Bollobás, B. (1985) · Cited by 6,196
Synchronization a universal concept in nonlinear sciences
PIKOVSKY, A. S., Rosenblum, M. G., & Kurths, J. (2001) · Cited by 5,640
The Evolution of Random Graphs
(1986) · CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics · doi:10.1090/cbms/062/06 · Cited by 5,543
Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces
Freeny, A. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488371 · Cited by 5,235
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Cited by
A cross-disorder connectome landscape of brain dysconnectivity
van den Heuvel, M. P., & Sporns, O. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0177-6 · Cited by 462
Optimally controlling the human connectome: the role of network topology
Betzel, R. F., Gu, S., Medaglia, J. D., Pasqualetti, F., & Bassett, D. S. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep30770 · Cited by 247
Motor control and neural plasticity through interhemispheric interactions
Takeuchi, N., Oouchida, Y., & Izumi, S.-I. (2012) · Neural Plasticity · doi:10.1155/2012/823285 · Cited by 171
Changing Brain Networks Through Non-invasive Neuromodulation
To, W. T., De Ridder, D., Hart Jr., J., & Vanneste, S. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00128 · Cited by 135
“Increasing evidence points to the influence of neuromodulation on whole brain networks by stimulating just one brain region (or brain hub; Grefkes and Fink, 2011; Fox et al., 2012b).”
BackgroundPanigrahy, A., Schmithorst, V. J., Wisnowski, J. L., Watson, C. G., Bellinger, D. C., Newburger, J. W., & Rivkin, M. J. (2015) · NeuroImage: Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2015.01.013 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R.
- Venue
- Brain
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-16
- Volume
- 134
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1264-1276
- ISSN
- 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2156
- OpenAlex
- W2136404265
- Cited by
- 632
- References
- 122
- FWCI
- 21.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/brain/awr033
- The paper
- Grefkes, C., & Fink, G. R. (2011). Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: new insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr033
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.