Cited by 427Epilepsy research and treatmentEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesNeurological disorders and treatments

Electroencephalographic source imaging: a prospective study of 152 operated epileptic patients

Open access
Brodbeck, V., Spinelli, L., Lascano, A. M., Wissmeier, M., Vargas, M.-I., Vulliemoz, S., Pollo, C., Schaller, K. +2 more·2011·Brain

Abstract

Electroencephalography is mandatory to determine the epilepsy syndrome. However, for the precise localization of the irritative zone in patients with focal epilepsy, costly and sometimes cumbersome imaging techniques are used. Recent small studies using electric source imaging suggest that electroencephalography itself could be used to localize the focus. However, a large prospective validation study is missing. This study presents a cohort of 152 operated patients where electric source imaging was applied as part of the pre-surgical work-up allowing a comparison with the results from other methods. Patients (n = 152) with >1 year postoperative follow-up were studied prospectively. The sensitivity and specificity of each imaging method was defined by comparing the localization of the source maximum with the resected zone and surgical outcome. Electric source imaging had a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 88% if the electroencephalogram was recorded with a large number of electrodes (128-256 channels) and the individual magnetic resonance image was used as head model. These values compared favourably with those of structural magnetic resonance imaging (76% sensitivity, 53% specificity), positron emission tomography (69% sensitivity, 44% specificity) and ictal/interictal single-photon emission-computed tomography (58% sensitivity, 47% specificity). The sensitivity and specificity of electric source imaging decreased to 57% and 59%, respectively, with low number of electrodes (<32 channels) and a template head model. This study demonstrated the validity and clinical utility of electric source imaging in a large prospective study. Given the low cost and high flexibility of electroencephalographic systems even with high channel counts, we conclude that electric source imaging is a highly valuable tool in pre-surgical epilepsy evaluation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/brain/awr243

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Electrophysiological source imaging has been widely used in epilepsy source localization, including inter-ictal discharges.

    “ESI has been widely used in epilepsy source localization, including inter-ictal discharges (76–81).”
  • In a study with over 150 patients, source imaging using high density EEG recordings had higher sensitivity and specificity compared to other imaging modalities such as MRI and PET.

    “It has been shown in a study with over 150 patients that source imaging using high density EEG recordings, has higher sensitivity and specificity compared to other imaging modalities such as MRI and PET (78).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brodbeck, V., Spinelli, L., Lascano, A. M., Wissmeier, M., Vargas, M.-I., Vulliemoz, S., Pollo, C., Schaller, K., Michel, C. M., & Seeck, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University Hospital of Geneva (CH)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
Corresponding author
Seeck, M.
Venue
Brain
Published
2011-10-01
Volume
134
Issue
10
Pages
2887-2897
ISSN
  • 0006-8950 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2156
OpenAlex
W2134353725
Cited by
427
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
FWCI
14.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Brain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
  • reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (33CM30, 124089, 122073, 320030)
  • Centre d'Imagerie BioMédicale
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
EEG source localization, focal epilepsy, epileptic focus localization, preoperative assessment, surgical outcomes, PET, SPECT, sensitivity and specificity, epilepsy surgery
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Preschool, Electroencephalography, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radionuclide Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review