The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effect of increased vegetable and fruit consumption on markers of oxidative cellular damage
Abstract
The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that increased consumption of vegetables and fruit would reduce markers of oxidative cellular damage that can be assessed in blood or urine. Twenty-eight women participated in a 14 day dietary intervention. The primary end-points assessed were: 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in DNA isolated from peripheral lymphocytes, determined by HPLC with electrochemical detection; 8-OHdG excreted in urine, measured by ELISA; malondialdehyde (MDA) in urine, measured by fluorimetric detection following derivatization with thiobarituric acid and separation via HPLC; urinary 8-isoprostane F-2alpha (8-EPG) detected by ELISA. Pre- and post-intervention plasma levels of selected carotenoids were determined by HPLC. Subjects were free living and consumed a completely defined recipe-based diet that increased their average daily consumption of vegetables and fruit from 5.8 servings at baseline to 12.0 servings throughout the intervention. Overall, the level of 8-OHdG in DNA isolated from lymphocytes and in urine and the level of 8-EPG in urine were reduced by the intervention, whereas urine concentrations of MDA were minimally affected. The reduction in lymphocyte 8-OHdG was greater in magnitude (32 versus 5%) in individuals with lower average pre-intervention levels of plasma alpha-carotene (56 ng/ml) than in individuals with higher average pre-intervention plasma levels of alpha-carotene (148 ng/ml). The results of this study indicate that consumption of a diet that significantly increased vegetable and fruit intake from a diverse number of botanical families resulted in significant reductions in markers of oxidative cellular damage to DNA and lipids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vegetables, Fruit, and Cancer Prevention
STEINMETZ, K. A., & POTTER, J. D. (1996) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/s0002-8223(96)00273-8 · Cited by 2,118
Cited by
Del Rio, D., Rodriguez-Mateos, A., Spencer, J. P. E., Tognolini, M., Borges, G., & Crozier, A. (2013) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2012.4581 · Cited by 2,601
Halliwell, B., Rafter, J., & Jenner, A. (2005) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/81.1.268s · Cited by 711
Effects of exercise and diet on chronic disease
Roberts, C. K., & Barnard, R. J. (2005) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00852.2004 · Cited by 556
New developments and novel therapeutic perspectives for vitamin C
Li, Y., & Schellhorn, H. E. (2007) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/137.10.2171 · Cited by 508
Holt, E. M., Steffen, L. M., Moran, A., Basu, S., Steinberger, J., Ross, J. A., Hong, C.-P., & Sinaiko, A. R. (2009) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2008.11.036 · Cited by 496
Metadata
- Authors
- Thompson, H. J., Heimendinger, J., Haegele, A., Sedlacek, S. M., Gillette, C., O'neill, C., Wolfe, P., & Conry, C.
- Venue
- Carcinogenesis
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2261-2266
- ISSN
- 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2180
- OpenAlex
- W2168168424
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of increased vegetable and fruit consumption on markers of oxidative cellular damage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/carcin/20.12.2261
- The paper
- Thompson, H. J., Heimendinger, J., Haegele, A., Sedlacek, S. M., Gillette, C., O'neill, C., Wolfe, P., & Conry, C. (1999). Effect of increased vegetable and fruit consumption on markers of oxidative cellular damage. Carcinogenesis. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/20.12.2261
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.