Cited by 110Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsChromatin Remodeling and CancerDNA Repair Mechanisms

Understanding mutagenesis through delineation of mutational signatures in human cancer

Open access
Petljak, Mia, Alexandrov, Ludmil B.·2016·Carcinogenesis

Abstract

Each individual cell within a human body acquires a certain number of somatic mutations during a course of its lifetime. These mutations originate from a wide spectra of both endogenous and exogenous mutational processes that leave distinct patterns of mutations, termed mutational signatures, embedded within the genomes of all cells. In recent years, the vast amount of data produced by sequencing of cancer genomes was coupled with novel mathematical models and computational tools to generate the first comprehensive map of mutational signatures in human cancer. Up to date, >30 distinct mutational signatures have been identified, and etiologies have been proposed for many of them. This review provides a brief historical background on examination of mutational patterns in human cancer, summarizes the knowledge accumulated since introducing the concept of mutational signatures and discusses their future potential applications and perspectives within the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/carcin/bgw055

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Comon, P. (2010) Handbook of Blind Source Separation: Independent Component Analysis and Blind Deconvolution. Elsevier, Boston, MA.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petljak, M., & Alexandrov, L. B.
Affiliations
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Carcinogenesis
Published
2016-05-04
Volume
37
Issue
6
Pages
531-540
ISSN
  • 0143-3334 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2180
OpenAlex
W2345503748
Cited by
110
References
114
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1
FWCI
1.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Carcinogenesis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy
  • National Nuclear Security Administration
  • Los Alamos National Laboratory
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Chromatin Remodeling and Cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
Keywords
mutational signatures, somatic mutations, mutagenesis, human cancer, cancer genomics, mutation patterns
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Genome, Human, Mutagenesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review