Cited by 39DNA Repair MechanismsCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsEpigenetics and DNA Methylation

DNA polymerase η mutational signatures are found in a variety of different types of cancer

Open access
Rogozin, Igor B., Goncearenco, Alexander, Lada, Artem G., De, Subhajyoti, Yurchenko, Vyacheslav, Nudelman, German, Panchenko, Anna R., Cooper, David N. +1 more·2018·Cell Cycle

Abstract

DNA polymerase (pol) η is a specialized error-prone polymerase with at least two quite different and contrasting cellular roles: to mitigate the genetic consequences of solar UV irradiation, and promote somatic hypermutation in the variable regions of immunoglobulin genes. Misregulation and mistargeting of pol η can compromise genome integrity. We explored whether the mutational signature of pol η could be found in datasets of human somatic mutations derived from normal and cancer cells. A substantial excess of single and tandem somatic mutations within known pol η mutable motifs was noted in skin cancer as well as in many other types of human cancer, suggesting that somatic mutations in A:T bases generated by DNA polymerase η are a common feature of tumorigenesis. Another peculiarity of pol ηmutational signatures, mutations in YCG motifs, led us to speculate that error-prone DNA synthesis opposite methylated CpG dinucleotides by misregulated pol η in tumors might constitute an additional mechanism of cytosine demethylation in this hypermutable dinucleotide.

Verified 2026-10-06 · 1 reference not checked yet

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This study searched human somatic mutation datasets for the mutational footprint of DNA polymerase η and found enrichment of its mutable motifs in skin melanoma and many other cancers, but not in normal skin or several tumor types. The authors also observed a negative correlation between AID- and pol η-associated motif excess and linked POLH expression patterns to some tumor cohorts.

Key findings

  • In normal skin, mutations were enriched 1.2-fold in TC/GA and CT/AG motifs (P < 10⁻¹⁰), while WA/TW showed no significant excess. Skin cancer overall showed excesses for both TC/GA–CT/AG (1.09, P < 10⁻¹⁰) and WA/TW (1.37, P < 10⁻¹⁰); skin cutaneous melanoma showed stronger excesses (1.47 and 1.42, both P < 10⁻¹⁰), whereas skin adenocarcinoma showed none.
  • Among non-skin cancers, single mutations in WA/TW were significantly enriched in 11 of 14 solid tumor types, including skin (1.38), rectum (1.22), stomach (1.17), prostate (1.15), kidney (1.14), pancreas (1.13), cervix (1.11), bladder (1.1), colon (1.08), breast (1.06), and ovary (1.03, P = 0.0006). No significant excess was found for merged blood cancers, acute myeloid leukemia, liver, lung, or uterus; CLL (1.22, P = 0.00009) and GCB lymphomas (1.44, P = 0.00003) were significant blood-cancer subtypes.
  • Tandem mutations in WA/TW were significantly enriched in 3 of 8 cancer types: lung (2.6, P = 5.3 × 10⁻⁶), ovary (5.65, P = 4.7 × 10⁻⁶), and skin (1.47, P = 6 × 10⁻⁸); across all somatic mutations the excess was 1.83 (P < 10⁻¹⁰). Lung squamous cell carcinoma showed a 1.3-fold excess (P = 0.0005), while lung adenocarcinoma did not.
  • AID- and pol η-associated motif excesses were negatively correlated (R = −0.44, P = 0.044, one-tailed). POLH expression was high in skin cutaneous melanoma and lymphoid neoplasm diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and reduced in colorectal and uterine cancer cohorts.

Methods

  • Somatic mutation datasets came from normal skin, various normal tissues, and ICGC/TCGA cancer genome projects via the Sanger COSMIC Whole Genome Project v75. For each substitution, a 120-bp sequence centered on the mutation was extracted, and the frequency of pol η motifs at mutated sites was compared with motif frequency in the surrounding neighborhood using the Fm/Fs ratio and Fisher’s exact test.
  • A power analysis for normal tissues used 1,000 resampling iterations with sample sizes matched to the normal-tissue mutation set (552 mutations). POLH expression was analyzed from TCGA RNA-Seq data using normalized RSEM values retrieved through FireBrowse.

Limitations

  • The paper states that the WA/TW motif is short and less informative than AID/APOBEC motifs; that signature decomposition is heuristic and a signature cannot be assumed to reflect only one molecular mechanism; that the proposed YCG demethylation role for pol η requires experimental validation; and that the AID–pol η negative correlation is only marginally significant. It also notes that normal-tissue datasets are limited, though its power analysis suggested the negative findings likely reflect biology.
  • Evident from the text: the work is correlational and does not directly demonstrate pol η activity in tumors; cancer mutation spectra may be influenced by exogenous mutagens such as smoking or UV, by differing subtype representation, and by hotspot events such as BCL2 translocation, which the authors show can skew exome-wide motif analyses.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15384101.2017.1404208

Cites

55 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 34 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    In lung adenocarcinoma, no significant association between mutations and the WA/TW context was found.

    “No significant association between mutations and the WA/TW context was found in lung adenocarcinoma, whereas a significant excess (1.3, P = 0.0005) of somatic mutations in the WA/TW context was found for lung squamous cell carcinoma”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    POLH gene expression is highly variable across TCGA cohorts.

    “The observed high variability in POLH gene expression suggests that the gene is highly expressed only in a subset of TCGA tumor cohorts (Supplementary Figure 1) which is consistent with previous studies 44 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingcitation

    Colorectal and uterine cancer subsets (COAD, UCEC), previously reported to have no association with pol η activity, show reduced POLH expression.

    “Notably, subsets of colorectal and uterine cancer (COAD, UCEC), which have been previously reported to have no association with polymerase pol h activity, exhibit reduced POLH gene expression 45,46 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [45] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [46] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Findingown data

    In normal skin samples, single mutations in TC/GA and CT/AG dinucleotides showed a 1.2-fold excess.

    “A 1.2-fold excess of mutations (defined as described in Materials and Methods) in TC/GA and CT/AG dinucleotides was detected (Table 1).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In follicular lymphoma, 24% of mutated 5'UTR WA/TW motifs occurred within the BCL2 gene (19 of 28 mutations at A:T bases).

    “Specifically, a detailed analysis of pol h mutability suggested that a substantial proportion (24%) of mutated 5'UTR WA/TW motifs occurred within the BCL2 gene (19 out of 28 mutations at A: T bases).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 10
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 2
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    In skin cutaneous melanoma, there was a substantial and significant excess of somatic mutations in both the TC/GA and CT/AG motifs and the WA/TW motif.

    “A substantial (and significant) excess of somatic mutations for the both mutable motifs was found for skin cutaneous melanoma (Table 1) where the frequency of UV photoproducts is expected to be high.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    DNA polymerase η copies undamaged DNA with lower fidelity than most DNA-directed polymerases, with an average base-substitution error rate of 3.5 × 10−2.

    “DNA pol h copies undamaged DNA with a lower fidelity than most DNA-directed polymerases with an average base-substitution error rate of 3.5 £ 10 ¡2 [22][23][24] .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    pol η may be involved in mutagenesis in some lung cancer subtypes but not others.

    “suggesting that DNA pol h may be involved in mutagenesis in some lung cancer subtypes but not others.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    DNA polymerase η bypasses UV photoproducts at TT tandem bases with high accuracy, inserting AA in over 99% of bypass events and reducing mutagenesis.

    “Bypass of UV-induced photoproducts at TT tandem bases by the yeast and human translesion pol h (a member of the Y family of specialized DNA polymerases) is relatively accurate; this polymerase inserts the complementary AA nucleotides into the newly synthesized DNA in more than 99% of bypass events”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [21] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Germline mutations in POLH cause the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum, XPV.

    “Germline mutations in the gene (POLH) encoding DNA pol h result in XPV, a variant type of xeroderma pigmentosum 25 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [25] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The contradiction in lung cancer may result from greater sensitivity of tandem mutation analysis or from differential representation of lung cancer subtypes in single and tandem mutation datasets.

    “This may result from greater sensitivity of the tandem mutation analysis or from differential representation of lung cancer subtypes in datasets of single and tandem mutations.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    The mutable motif of pol η is the short WA/TW sequence, defined in somatic hypermutation and in vitro systems.

    “The mutable motif of pol h, the short motif WA/TW (W = A or T) was delineated in the context of somatic hypermutations and in vitro systems 22,23 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [22] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [23] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Signature 9 is characterized by a pattern widely attributed to pol η, although a higher frequency of T:A > G:C transversions compared to T:A > C:G transitions has not been observed in pol η studies in vitro or in vivo.

    “although a higher frequency of T:A > G:C transversions compared to T:A > C:G transitions, has not been observed in studies of pol h either in vitro or in vivo 27,29 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [27] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [29] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductcitation

    The approach of comparing mutable motif frequencies in mutation locations to those in the DNA neighborhood was thoroughly tested and demonstrated high accuracy.

    “This approach was thoroughly tested and its high accuracy demonstrated 36 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationcitation

    Previous studies point to pol η being an important mutagenic factor in normal skin and cancer cells.

    “Thus, all these studies point to pol h being an important mutagenic factor in normal skin and cancer cells.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [18] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [48] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    The observed effect size (Supplementary Table 1) is likely to reflect the biological properties of the samples and is unlikely to result from small sample size, at least for somatic mutations from normal tissues.

    “Thus, the observed effect size (Supplementary Table 1) is likely to reflect the biological properties of these samples and is unlikely to result from the small sample size, at least for somatic mutations from normal tissues.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    A recent study extended the potential mutagenic activity of pol η to solid tumors, where somatic mutations produced by pol η are likely associated with other factors including exogenous exposures, UV radiation or alcohol consumption.

    “The recent study extended a range of potential mutagenic activity of pol h to solid tumors where somatic mutations produced by pol h are likely to be associated with the other factors, including exogenous exposures, UV radiation or alcohol consumption 31 .”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [31] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    DNA polymerase η is thought to scan a limited length of DNA to mutate nucleotides in a preferred motif.

    “pol h is thought to scan a limited length of DNA to mutate nucleotides in a preferred motif 36,54 .”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [36] source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [54] source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    The results indicate that regulation of DNA polymerase η in cancer cells is complex and provide an explanation for why pol η mutational signatures are found only in some cancer types/subtypes.

    “These results hint at the complexity of regulation of pol h in cancer cells and provide an explanation of why pol h mutational signatures are found only in some cancer types/subtypes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
14 of 14
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    pol η is responsible for inaccurate bypass of dimers in CC, TC and CT dinucleotides.

    “If we assume that pol h is responsible for the inaccurate bypass of dimers in CC, TC and CT dinucleotides, one would expect there to be an excess of single mutations in TC and CT dinucleotides”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

  • GCB lymphoma mutation excess is overstated

    Major

    The reported motif excess is defined as the fraction of mutations divided by the fraction of motifs in surrounding regions. For GCB lymphomas, the printed fractions give about 1.14, not 1.44.

    Reported 1.44 · recomputed 1.139535

1 of 1

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Loeb LA, 1974, Cancer Res, 34, 2311

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogozin, I. B., Goncearenco, A., Lada, A. G., De, S., Yurchenko, V., Nudelman, G., Panchenko, A. R., Cooper, D. N., & Pavlov, Y. I.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Ostrava (CZ)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Rogozin, Igor B.
  • Pavlov, Youri I.
Venue
Cell Cycle
Published
2018-02-01
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
348-355
ISSN
  • 1538-4101 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-4005
OpenAlex
W2769836470
Cited by
39
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Cycle (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Boettcher Foundation, American Cancer Society (P30 CA072720)
  • NE DHHS LB506 (2017-48)
  • Moravskoslezsky kraj research initiative (01211/2016/RRC)
  • Fred & Pamela Buffett Cancer Center (P30 CA072720)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Keywords
mutational signatures, somatic mutations, error-prone DNA replication, skin cancer, CpG demethylation, genome stability, carcinogenesis
MeSH terms
Y-Family DNA Polymerases, Base Sequence, DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase, Humans, Mutation, Neoplasms, Skin, Skin Neoplasms, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Exome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review