Cited by 4Food composition and propertiesNutritional Studies and DietNatural Antidiabetic Agents Studies

Effects of Whole Grain Intake, Compared to Refined Grain, on Glycemia and Insulinemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Open access
Sanders, Lisa, Zhu, Yong, Wilcox, Meredith, Koecher, Katie, Maki, Kevin·2021·Current Developments in Nutrition

Abstract

Epidemiological study results suggest that whole grain (WG) consumption is associated with a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes; however, the potential mechanism behind this observation is unclear. WG intake may lower postprandial glycemia and insulinemia and improve insulin sensitivity, thereby contributing to a reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the impact of WG on postprandial glycemia and insulinemia and markers of glycemic control and insulin sensitivity/resistance. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of WG intake, compared to refined grain (RG) intake, on postprandial glycemia and insulinemia area under the curve and markers of glycemic control and insulin sensitivity/resistance in adults. A search of PubMed and Scopus yielded 80 relevant RCTs. Pooled estimates were expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) between the WG intervention and RG control group. WG intake resulted in a significant reduction of postprandial glycemia (SMD: −0.46, 95% CI: −0.59, −0.33, P < 0.001) and insulinemia (SMD: −0.29, 95% CI: −0.39, −0.20, P < 0.001), compared to RG intake. There were no significant effects of WG on fasting glucose, fasting insulin, or homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR); however, there was a marginally significant benefit of WG intake for glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (P = 0.050). Compared to RG foods, WG foods improve postprandial glycemia and insulinemia which may partially explain the association of WG intake and reduced risk of type 2 diabetes. However, WG intake did not impact long-term markers of glycemic and insulinemic control, except for a marginally significant effect on HbA1c. While short term improvements in glycemic response may be beneficial, more investigations are needed to determine if these lead to long-term benefits in reducing the risk of type 2 diabetes. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42020180069 This research was funded by General Mills, Inc.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cdn/nzab041_036

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sanders, L., Zhu, Y., Wilcox, M., Koecher, K., & Maki, K.
Affiliations
  • General Mills (United States) (US)
  • Indiana University (US)
Venue
Current Developments in Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
5
Pages
521
ISSN
2475-2991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3168891624
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
0.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Developments in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Natural Antidiabetic Agents Studies
Keywords
whole grains, refined grains, postprandial blood glucose, insulin levels, insulin sensitivity, insulin resistance, HbA1c, type 2 diabetes risk, glycemic control, dietary fiber

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review