Cited by 203Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative DiseasesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Systematic Regional Variations in the Loss of Cortical Cholinergic Fibers in Alzheimer's Disease

Geula, Changiz, Mesulam, M.-Marsel·1996·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

The loss of cortical cholinergic fibers in Alzheimer's disease was investigated using choline acetyltransferase immunohistochemistry and acetylcholinesterase histochemistry. Within both the normal and Alzheimer's cerebral cortex, the two methods revealed an identical pattern of fiber staining. In the normal brain, cholinergic fiber density was highest in limbic and paralimbic cortical zones, intermediate in most sensory-motor and association zones, and lowest within the primary visual and visual association areas of the occipital lobe. In general, supragranular cortical layers contained a higher density of cholinergic fibers, and most of these were oriented vertically. In Alzheimer's disease, an overall 55% loss of cortical cholinergic fibers was detected. There was, however, marked regional variations in the extent of this loss in different cortical areas. Cortical areas within the temporal lobe, particularly the temporal association areas, displayed a dramatic loss of cholinergic fibers. By contrast, the anterior cingulate cortex, primary visual, primary somatosensory, and primary motor cortex displayed a relative preservation of cholinergic fibers. As a whole, greater loss of cholinergic fibers was detected in supragranular layers and in fibers oriented vertical to the cortical surface. These results indicate that cholinomimetic therapies are likely to have different effects on cholinergic transmission in various cortical areas. The precise mechanisms that lead to the regional variations in cortical cholinergic denervation in Alzheimer's disease remain to be elucidated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/6.2.165

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Geula, C., & Mesulam, M.-M.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
Geula, Changiz
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
1996
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
165-177
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W1964729801
Cited by
202
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
4.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG-08812, AG 10282, R29AG010282, P50AG005134, AG 05134)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cholinergic denervation, regional variation, choline acetyltransferase, acetylcholinesterase, temporal lobe, limbic cortex
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cerebral Cortex, Cholinergic Fibers, Female, Hippocampus, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Tissue Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review