The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 89 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Electrophysiological Studies of Human Face Perception. III: Effects of Top-down Processing on Face-specific Potentials
Abstract
This is the last in a series of papers dealing with intracranial event-related potential (ERP) correlates of face perception. Here we describe the results of manipulations that may exert top-down influences on face recognition and face-specific ERPs, and the effects of cortical stimulation at face-specific sites. Ventral face-specific N200 was not evoked by affective stimuli; showed little or no habituation; was not affected by the familiarity or unfamiliarity of faces; showed no semantic priming; and was not affected by face-name learning or identification. P290 and N700 were affected by semantic priming and by face-name learning and identification. The early fraction of N700 and face-specific P350 exhibited significant habituation. About half of the AP350 sites exhibited semantic priming, whereas the VP350 and LP350 sites did not. Cortical stimulation evoked a transient inability to name familiar faces or evoked face-related hallucinations at two-thirds of face-specific N200 sites. These results are discussed in relation to human behavioral studies and monkey single-cell recordings. Discussion of results of all three papers concludes that: face-specific N200 reflects the operation of a module specialized for the perception of human faces; ventral and lateral occipitotemporal cortex are composed of a complex mosaic of functionally discrete patches of cortex of variable number, size and location; in ventral cortex there is a posterior-to-anterior trend in the location of patches in the order letter-strings, form, hands, objects, faces and face parts; P290 and N700 at face-specific N200 sites, and face-specific P350, are subject to top-down influences.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“There may be columns of neurons specialized for the recognition of letters, graphemes, or words, but they are likely to be intermixed with other neurons involved in object and face recognition (Puce et al., 1999).”
From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Puce et al., 1999
In the citing paper
“Given that the VWFA may contain cortical columns specialized for letter processing, mixed with columns with different preferences (Puce et al., 1999), it is likely that a disruption of the VWFA would induce some degree of impairment beyond reading (Behrmann et al., 1998a).”
From Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area (2004) · cites this paper as Puce et al., 1999
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Cummins, R., & Fodor, J. A. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184717 · Cited by 4,791
Understanding face recognition
Bruce, V., & Young, A. (1986) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1986.tb02199.x · Cited by 4,067
IARBUS, A. L. (1967) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 3,319
Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans
Bentin, S., Allison, T., Puce, A., Perez, E., & McCarthy, G. (1996) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.6.551 · Cited by 3,181
Borders of Multiple Visual Areas in Humans Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Sereno, M. I., Dale, A. M., Reppas, J. B., Kwong, K. K., Belliveau, J. W., Brady, T. J., Rosen, B. R., & Tootell, R. B. H. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7754376 · Cited by 2,663
MODALITY AND TOPOGRAPHIC PROPERTIES OF SINGLE NEURONS OF CAT'S SOMATIC SENSORY CORTEX
Mountcastle, V. B. (1957) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1957.20.4.408 · Cited by 2,411
The columnar organization of the neocortex
Mountcastle, V. B. (1997) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/120.4.701 · Cited by 2,314
Habituation: a dual-process theory.
Groves, P. M., & Thompson, R. F. (1970) · Psychology Review · doi:10.1037/h0029810 · Cited by 2,110
Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI
Engel, S. A. (1997) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/7.2.181 · Cited by 1,606
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 422
The roles of the “visual word form area” in reading
Hillis, A. E., Newhart, M., Heidler, J., Barker, P. B., Herskovits, E. H., & Degaonkar, M. N. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.08.026 · Cited by 153
III. Electrophysiological Studies of Face Processing in Williams Syndrome
Mills, D. L., Alvarez, T. D., George, M. S., Appelbaum, L. G., Bellugi, U., & Neville, H. J. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900561977 · Cited by 147
“The N200 was generated in the ventral and lateral face areas and was active during face perception but was not elicited by affective stimuli, diminished by habituation, affected by familiarity of the face, nor affected by semantic priming or face naming (Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundRousselet, G. A. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00137 · Cited by 142
“Similarly, intracranial recordings failed to reveal top-down modulation of the N200 to faces (Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundIs the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention?
Cauquil, A. S., Edmonds, G. E., & Taylor, M. J. (2000) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/00001756-200007140-00021 · Cited by 138
Source Localization of Early Stages of Face Processing
Herrmann, M. J., Ehlis, A., Muehlberger, A., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2005) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-005-0277-7 · Cited by 135
Horovitz, S. G., Rossion, B., Skudlarski, P., & Gore, J. C. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.018 · Cited by 134
“…are observed in humans using neuroimaging (e.g., Gauthier et al., 2000; Haxby et al., 2000; Kanwisher et al., 1997; Puce et al., 1995; Rossion et al., 2000; Sergent et al., 1992) and field potential recordings on the cortical surface (Allison et al., 1999; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundInsights into cortical mechanisms of behavior from microstimulation experiments
Histed, M. H., Ni, A. M., & Maunsell, J. H. R. (2012) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2012.01.006 · Cited by 136
Priming Visual Face-Processing Mechanisms: Electrophysiological Evidence
Shlomo Bentin, A., Sagiv, N., Mecklinger, A., Friederici, A. D., & von Cramon, Y. D. (2002) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00435 · Cited by 132
Rossion, B., Schiltz, C., Robaye, L., Pirenne, D., & Crommelinck, M. (2001) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892901753165917 · Cited by 129
“Scalp ERP studies and intracranial recordings indicate that early visual components (below 250 msec) are not influenced by face familiarity (Bentin & Deouell, 2000; Eimer, 2000; Paller et al., 2000; Puce et al., 1999; Rossion et al., 1999) and thus preferentially support this last hypothesis.”
BackgroundInversion and contrast-reversal effects on face processing assessed by MEG
Itier, R. J., Herdman, A. T., George, N., Cheyne, D. O., & Taylor, M. J. (2006) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2006.07.072 · Cited by 129
“…with the involvement of a lateral source also found in some fMRI studies around the superior temporal sulcus (STS) region (Ishai et al., 2005; Puce et al., 1995) and with intracranial recordings of the face-specific component N200 (Allison et al., 1999; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundDissociation of face-selective cortical responses by attention
Furey, M. L., Tanskanen, T., Beauchamp, M. S., Avikainen, S., Uutela, K., Hari, R., & Haxby, J. V. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0510124103 · Cited by 128
Can predictive coding explain repetition suppression?
Grotheer, M., & Kovács, G. (2016) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.027 · Cited by 108
The effects of priming on frontal-temporal communication
Ghuman, A. S., Bar, M., Dobbins, I. G., & Schnyer, D. M. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0710674105 · Cited by 125
Todd, R. M., Lewis, M. D., Meusel, L.-A., & Zelazo, P. D. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.10.011 · Cited by 125
“…a number of studies have found that the N170 does not discriminate between famous faces and unknown faces (Bentin & Deouell, 2000; Eimer, 2000; Puce et al., 1999; Zion-Golumbic & Bentin, 2007, but see Latinus, Bayle, Deltheil, Bohler, & Taylor, under review), and that discrimination of…”
BackgroundThe pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: “the visual word form area”
Price, C. J., & Devlin, J. T. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.01.018 · Cited by 124
Focal electrical intracerebral stimulation of a face-sensitive area causes transient prosopagnosia
Jonas, J., Descoins, M., Koessler, L., Colnat‐Coulbois, S., Sauvée, M., Guye, M., Vignal, J., Vespignani, H., Rossion, B., & Maillard, L. G. (2012) · Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.07.021 · Cited by 123
“Many studies have recorded face-specific or face-sensitive potentials around that latency in the fusiform gyrus (N200: Allison et al., 1994, 1999; P180: Halgren et al., 1994; N200: McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999; N160: Mundel et al., 2003; P160: Barbeau et al., 2008), including one study with fMRI functional…”
InfluentialAnimal and human faces in natural scenes: How specific to human faces is the N170 ERP component?
Rousselet, G. A., Macé, M. J. ‐., & Fabre‐Thorpe, M. (2004) · Journal of Vision · doi:10.1167/4.1.2 · Cited by 122
Vidal, J. R., Ossandón, T., Jerbi, K., Dalal, S. S., Minotti, L., Ryvlin, P., Kahane, P., & Lachaux, J.-P. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00195 · Cited by 133
Neural repetition suppression to identity is abolished by other-race faces
Vizioli, L., Rousselet, G. A., & Caldara, R. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1005751107 · Cited by 131
The effect of face patch microstimulation on perception of faces and objects
Moeller, S., Crapse, T. B., Chang, L., & Tsao, D. Y. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4527 · Cited by 121
Perceiving electrical stimulation of identified human visual areas
Murphey, D. K., Maunsell, J. H. R., Beauchamp, M. S., & Yoshor, D. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0804998106 · Cited by 109
“(16) reported the perception of faces and face parts after stimulation of the fusiform gyrus], it is unknown whether the complexity of stimulation-induced percepts changes systematically across visual areas.”
BackgroundBabies and Brains: Habituation in Infant Cognition and Functional Neuroimaging
Chun, M. M. (2008) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.016.2008 · Cited by 130
The Functional Neuroanatomy of Object Agnosia: A Case Study
Konen, C. S., Behrmann, M., Nishimura, M., & Kästner, S. (2011) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.030 · Cited by 113
“These studies have shown that electrical stimulation of LOC in epileptic patients, implanted with electrodes for seizure focus localization, interferes with object recognition (Puce et al., 1999) and that lesions of these regions produce deficits in object recognition (Damasio et al.”
The human temporal lobe integrates facial form and motion: evidence from fMRI and ERP studies
Puce, A., Syngeniotis, A., Thompson, J. C., Abbott, D. F., Wheaton, K. J., & Castiello, U. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00189-7 · Cited by 113
“Previous ERPs elicited to static isolated faces appear to have two generator sources, as indicated by intracranial recordings made from the surface of temporo-occipital cortex (e.g., Allison et al., 1999; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialScale invariant adaptation in fusiform face-responsive regions
Eger, E., Schyns, P. G., & Kleinschmidt, A. K. (2004) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.028 · Cited by 112
Neuronal Correlates of Face Identification in the Monkey Anterior Temporal Cortical Areas
Eifuku, S., de Souza, W. C., Tamura, R., Nishijo, H., & Ono, T. (2004) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00198.2003 · Cited by 116
Knowing Who's Boss: fMRI and ERP Investigations of Social Dominance Perception
Chiao, J. Y., Adams, R. B., Tse, P. U., Lowenthal, W. T., Richeson, J. A., & Ambady, N. (2008) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430207088038 · Cited by 107
“In previous work on humans the N200 has been associated with face processing and visual attention ( Allison, Puce, Spencer, & McCarthy, 1999a,1999b ).”
BackgroundMethodTaylor, M. J., & Baldeweg, T. (2002) · Developmental Science · doi:10.1111/1467-7687.00372 · Cited by 107
Neural and cognitive face-selective markers: An integrative review
Yovel, G. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.09.026 · Cited by 107
“Intracranial recordings reveal a face-specific response 200 ms after stimulus onset (N200) as was first reported by Allison et al. (1999), McCarthyet al. (1999) and Puce et al. (1999).”
Shlomo Bentin, A., & Golland, Y. (2002) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00124-5 · Cited by 106
“Because the N170 effect is enhanced rather than reduced by face inversion (Rossion et al., 1999, 2000), it is not sensitive to face familiarity (Bentin & Deouell, 2000), and it is elicited by isolated face parts (particularly eyes) as well as by full face-gestalts, Bentin and his collaborators suggested that the N170…”
Olson, I. R. (2001) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/124.7.1417 · Cited by 109
“, 1989), most recordings from the human hippocampus have not demonstrated learning-related ERP changes (Nobre and McCarthy, 1995; Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundInfluentialSreenivasan, K. K., & Jha, A. P. (2007) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.32 · Cited by 115
“Although evidence exists for short-term habituation of early ERP components ( Woods & Elmasian, 1986), recent studies suggest that the N170 may not be susceptible to habituation ( Puce, Allison, & McCarthy, 1999 ).”
BackgroundProcessing of Facial Emotion in the Human Fusiform Gyrus
Kawasaki, H., Tsuchiya, N., Kovach, C. K., Nourski, K. V., Oya, H., Howard, M. A., & Adolphs, R. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00175 · Cited by 104
“The AUC from our ROC analysis reached almost 1 in both epochs (Figure 6D, maximum AUC of 0.99 for static and 0.99 for dynamic), demonstrating that maximum ERBPs from single trials can almost perfectly distinguish responses to faces from those to control checkerboards.”
InfluentialBosking, W. H., Beauchamp, M. S., & Yoshor, D. (2017) · Annual Review of Vision Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114525 · Cited by 93
“…or moving objects (Rauschecker et al. 2011, Richer et al. 1991), complex objects such as faces or face parts ( Jonas et al. 2014a, Lee et al. 2000, Puce et al. 1999), or hallucinations of visual scenes that the patient is familiar with (Figure 11b) (Megevand et al. 2014). www.annualreviews.org •…”
Testing cognitive models of visual attention with fMRI and MEG
Downing, P. E., Liu, J., & Kanwisher, N. (2001) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00121-x · Cited by 103
Rossion, B., Retter, T. L., & Liu‐Shuang, J. (2020) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.14865 · Cited by 113
Rapid Face-Selective Adaptation of an Early Extrastriate Component in MEG
Harris, A. M., & Nakayama, K. (2006) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhj124 · Cited by 102
Tsuchiya, N., Kawasaki, H., Oya, H., Howard, M. A., & Adolphs, R. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003892 · Cited by 102
“Arguably the best combination of large anatomical field-of-view, good spatial resolution, excellent temporal resolution, and wide frequency bandwidth, is afforded by field potentials, which can be recorded in awake neurosurgical subjects [1–4,6–8,41–44].”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialThe effect of encoding strategy on the neural correlates of memory for faces
Bernstein, L. J. (2002) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00070-7 · Cited by 101
“[25,26,31,49,56]) studies suggest that the fusiform is specialized for face and/or object perception.”
BackgroundElectrophysiological Correlates of Age and Gender Perception on Human Faces
Mouchetant‐Rostaing, Y., & Giard, M. (2003) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892903322370816 · Cited by 100
“At the physiological level, the neural systems mediating face perception have been widely examined in a number of studies using functional neuroimaging techniques (review in Haxby, Hoffman, & Gobbini, 2000; Kanwisher, 2000; McCarthy, 1999) and human electrophysiology (Allison, Ginter, et al., 1994; Allison, Puce, Spen…”
MethodNeural Correlates of Person RecognitionPreprint
Paller, K. A., Charan Ranganath, A., Gonsalves, B. D., LaBar, K. S., Parrish, T. B., Gitelman, D. R., Mesulam, M. M., & Reber, P. J. (2003) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.57403 · Cited by 100
“Earlier potentials such as the face-sensitive N170 (Bentin et al. 1996; Puce et al. 1999) did not differ between conditions .”
BackgroundSugiura, M., Kawashima, R., Nakamura, K., Sato, N., Nakamura, A., Kato, T., Hatano, K., Schormann, T., Zilles, K., Sato, K., et al. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0747 · Cited by 104
“Puce et al. (1999) addressed the issue of emantic (identity) priming on intracranial event-reated potential (ERP) study.”
BackgroundDomain specificity in the primate prefrontal cortex
Romanski, L. M. (2004) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/cabn.4.4.421 · Cited by 98
“Support for VLPFC involvement in object and face processing is apparent in neuroimaging studies of the human brain (Allison, Puce, Spencer, & McCarthy, 1999, Courtney, Ungerleider, Keil, & Haxby, 1996, 1997; Haxby et al., 1996; McCarthy et al., 1996; Puce, Allison, & McCarthy, 1999 ).”
Replay of Very Early Encoding Representations during Recollection
Jafarpour, A., Fuentemilla, L., Horner, A. J., Penny, W. D., & Düzel, E. (2013) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1865-13.2014 · Cited by 102
“An intriguing puzzle in memory research is that cortical representations of event contents, such as faces, emerge very rapidly, within 200 ms (McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999; Fisch et al., 2009; Rossion and Caharel, 2011), whereas encoding processes in brain regions that are critical for recollection (i.”
BackgroundHuettel, S. A., & McCarthy, G. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0900 · Cited by 96
de Souza, W. C., Eifuku, S., Tamura, R., Nishijo, H., & Ono, T. (2005) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00949.2004 · Cited by 103
“Previous studies of evoked potential using humans have suggested an early separation of face and gaze signals in the processing streams used for face perception (Allison et al. 1999; McCarthy et al. 1999; Puce et al. 1999; Shibata et al. 2002).”
BackgroundTemporal Dynamics of Neural Adaptation Effect in the Human Visual Ventral Stream
Noguchi, Y., Inui, K., & Kakigi, R. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0655-04.2004 · Cited by 95
“One previous study using intracranial event-related potential (ERP) reported that the first distinct response in visual ventral areas appears 200 msec after the stimulus onset (Puce et al., 1999).”
Bentley, P., Vuilleumier, P., Thiel, C. M., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2003) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00776.2002 · Cited by 91
Quantifying the Time Course of Visual Object Processing Using ERPs: It's Time to Up the Game
Rousselet, G. A., & Pernet, C. R. (2011) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00107 · Cited by 92
“…Glasgow, 58 Hillhead Street, Glasgow, G12 8QB, UK. e-mail: guillaume.rousselet@glasgow. ac.uk www.frontiersin.org May 2011 | Volume 2 | Article 107 | 1 PersPective Article published: 23 May 2011 doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00107 described as a specific response from a face module (Puce et al., 1999).”
InfluentialTemporopolar regions of the human brain
Mesulam, M. M. (2022) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awac339 · Cited by 95
Body selectivity in occipitotemporal cortex: Causal evidence
Downing, P. E., & Peelen, M. V. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.05.033 · Cited by 87
“Indeed, an early case study using this approach (Puce et al., 1999) reported that ventral temporal stimulation near the likely location of the fusiform body area evoked the percept of a human body.”
BackgroundEverhart, D. E., Shucard, J. L., Quatrin, T., & Shucard, D. W. (2001) · Neuropsychology · doi:10.1037//0894-4105.15.3.329 · Cited by 89
Pitcher, D. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5038-13.2014 · Cited by 88
“This hypothesis is consistent with electrophysiological data recorded intracranially from neuropsychological patients that shows a range of face tasks generate event-related potentials with the same latencies in both the ventral and lateral occipitotemporal cortices (Allison et al., 1999; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce e…”
BackgroundResultHandbook of Reward and Decision Making
Dreher, J., & Tremblay, L. (2009) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-374620-7.x0001-5 · Cited by 88
Emotional expressions evoke a differential response in the fusiform face area
Harry, B. B., Williams, M., Davis, C., & Kim, J. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00692 · Cited by 95
“Face selective brain regions are found throughout the posterior and anterior fusiform (Allison et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999; Tsao et al., 2008; Rajimehr et al., 2009; Ku et al., 2011; Nsar and Tootell, 2012; Tanji et al., 2012), suggesting that visual analysis of faces continues beyond the FFA.”
BackgroundBailey, A. J., Braeutigam, S., Jousmäki, V., & Swithenby, S. J. (2005) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.04061.x · Cited by 86
“Depth and cortical electrode studies in humans have recorded face-specific activity in the ventral temporal and frontal lobes (Halgren et al., 1994; Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundSpecies sensitivity of early face and eye processing
Itier, R. J., Roon, P. V., & Alain, C. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.031 · Cited by 84
“…on monkey cell recordings (Perrett et al., 1982; Perrett et al., 1985) and human intracranial data (Allison et al., 1999; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999), assumes that eye and face selective neurons co-exist in the human brain and that their differential response patterns to various…”
The Rise and Fall of Priming: How Visual Exposure Shapes Cortical Representations of Objects
Zago, L., Fenske, M. J., Aminoff, E., & Bar, M. (2005) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhi060 · Cited by 84
“In humans, regions involved in visual recognition have also been observed to produce a relatively reduced cortical response for repeated stimuli, as measured in studies using positron emission tomography (PET, Badgaiyan et al., 2001; Buckner et al., 1995), event related potentials (ERP, Puce et al., 1999; Rugg et al.…”
BackgroundVisual recognition of faces, objects, and words using degraded stimuli: Where and when it occurs
Pegna, A. J., Khateb, A., Michel, C. M., & Landis, T. (2004) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.20039 · Cited by 79
“…investigations that have reported a facespecific N200 from electrodes situated mainly at ventral occipitotemporal sites [Allison et al., 1994, 1999; Puce et al., 1999], and ERP studies describing the earliest response to faces at around 170 msec, the so-called N170, characterised by a…”
BackgroundResultEngell, A. D., & McCarthy, G. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.025 · Cited by 77
“We have previously suggested on the basis of ERP recordings made directly from ventral temporal cortex that there may be a temporal dimension to modular processing (Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundFaces and Eyes in Human Lateral Prefrontal Cortex
Chan, A. W.-Y., & Downing, P. E. (2011) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00051 · Cited by 78
Visual mental imagery and perception produce opposite adaptation effects on early brain potentials
Ganis, G., & Schendan, H. E. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.004 · Cited by 78
“For example, results showing no early effects of face repetition (e.g., Puce et al., 1999; Schweinberger et al., 2002b) using relatively long ISIs (∼ 2 s) are actually entirely compatible with findings showing early effects of repetition (e.g., Harris and Nakayama, 2007b; Jeffreys, 1996; Kovacs et…”
Engell, A. D., & McCarthy, G. (2010) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq206 · Cited by 77
“Cerebral Cortex May 2011;21:1213--1221 doi:10.1093/cercor/bhq206 Advance Access publication October 20, 2010”
BackgroundInfluentialDas, K., Giesbrecht, B., & Eckstein, M. P. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.030 · Cited by 77
“, 1997) and intracranial recording (Allison et al., 1999; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999) studies demonstrating that regions of the anterior fusiform gyrus in both hemispheres exhibit more robust responses to faces compared to other categories of stimuli.”
BackgroundResultEngell, A. D., & McCarthy, G. (2010) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1575-10.2010 · Cited by 76
“Face-N200 is largely insensitive to face repetition and to higher cognitive task manipulations, and this insensitivity has led to the proposal that face-N200 reflects an initial and obligatory neural response to faces (McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999).”
InfluentialPrivman, E., Nir, Y., Kramer, U., Kipervasser, S., Andelman, F., Neufeld, M. Y., Mukamel, R., Yeshurun, Y., Fried, I., & Malach, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4627-06.2007 · Cited by 71
“…regarding the functional properties of these areas derived from fMRI research (Grill-Spector and Malach, 2004), as well as previous iEEG studies (Puce et al., 1999), suggests that high-level visual representations likely include holistic aspects of the objects rather than low-level features…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialBeyond localisation: a dynamical dual route account of face recognition
de Gelder, B., & Rouw, R. (2001) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/s0001-6918(01)00024-5 · Cited by 74
“We mentioned already evidence about face selective cells from animal studies (Ashbridge, Perrett, Oram, & Jellema, 2000) and human electro-physiology (Puce et al., 1999).”
Event-related potentials of self-face recognition in children with pervasive developmental disorders
Gunji, A., Inagaki, M., Inoue, Y., Takeshima, Y., & Kaga, M. (2008) · Brain and Development · doi:10.1016/j.braindev.2008.04.011 · Cited by 73
“Face perception induces the N170 component in the occipito-temporal cortex, mainly in the fusiform gyrus [7,32–42].”
BackgroundTurk‐Browne, N. B., Norman-Haignere, S., & McCarthy, G. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00176 · Cited by 73
Schendan, H. E., & Ganis, G. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00329 · Cited by 73
“…to comparing mental imagery of these two categories is that faces and objects recruit different posterior visual processing areas (Hasson et al., 2003; Downing et al., 2006) and are associated with distinct ERP signatures (e.g., Schendan et al., 1998; Allison et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundCategory-Sensitive Excitatory and Inhibitory Processes in Human Extrastriate Cortex
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2002) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00202.2002 · Cited by 70
“Category-Sensitive Excitatory and Inhibitory Processes in Human Extrastriate Cortex”
BackgroundFace processing without awareness in the right fusiform gyrus
Morris, J. P., Pelphrey, K. A., & McCarthy, G. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.05.020 · Cited by 70
“This interpretation is consistent with intracranial ERP recordings showing that while the N200 is insensitive to attention and task demands, longer latency components may be modulated by top–down processing (Puce et al., 1999).”
Düzel, E., Picton, T. W., Cabeza, R. E. L., Yonelinas, A. P., Scheich, H., Heinze, H., & Tulving, E. (2001) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1028 · Cited by 70
Morris, J. P., Pelphrey, K. A., & McCarthy, G. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.01.035 · Cited by 69
Nonlinear Coupling between Evoked rCBF and BOLD Signals: A Simulation Study of Hemodynamic Responses
Mechelli, A., Price, C. J., & Friston, K. J. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0876 · Cited by 69
“Interestingly , intermediate components such as face specific N200 are insensitive to a wide variety of top-down processes (Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundCaharel, S., Ramon, M., & Rossion, B. (2013) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00451 · Cited by 72
Jonas, J., Rossion, B., Krieg, J., Koessler, L., Colnat‐Coulbois, S., Vespignani, H., Jacques, C., Vignal, J., Brissart, H., & Maillard, L. G. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.017 · Cited by 69
“…modulation of face categorization by electrical stimulation of the monkey infero-temporal cortex), impairment in face naming (Allison et al., 1994; Puce et al., 1999) or distortions of the physician's face following electrical stimulation of other faceselective regions (Parvizi et al., 2012;…”
BackgroundFast periodic stimulation (FPS): a highly effective approach in fMRI brain mapping
Gao, X., Gentile, F., & Rossion, B. (2018) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-018-1630-4 · Cited by 74
A Neural Network Reflecting Decisions about Human Faces
Druzgal, T. J., & D’Esposito, M. (2001) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00519-0 · Cited by 66
“1994, 1999 ; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999 ) and further neuroimaging studies (Gauthier et al., 1999, is a”
Guillem, F., Bicu, M., Pampoulova, T., Hooper, R., Bloom, D., Wolf, M.-A., Messier, J., Desautels, R., Todorov, C., Lalonde, P., et al. (2003) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/s0165-1781(03)00003-9 · Cited by 66
“P290, P350) appear to receive taskrelated top-down modulatory inputs from the frontal regions (Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundEffects of illuminance and correlated color temperature of indoor light on emotion perception
Li, Y., Ru, T., Chen, Q., Liu, Q., Luo, X., & Zhou, G. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-93523-y · Cited by 70
“16) of three kinds of oddball stimulus were evaluated before the main task with significant difference across them (F (2,87) = 602.”
BackgroundRossion, B., Jacques, C., & Jonas, J. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13596 · Cited by 71
ERP differences of pre-lexical processing between dyslexic and non-dyslexic children
Kast, M., Elmer, S., Jäncke, L., & Meyer, M. E. (2010) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.04.003 · Cited by 63
“…areas (Nobre et al., 1994) and it has been suggested that these brain areas could accommodate ensembles of neurons specialized in the recognition of letters, graphemes or words, and that they are likely to be intermixed with other neurons involved in object and face recognition (Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundRepetition suppression of face‐selective evoked and induced EEG recorded from human cortex
Engell, A. D., & McCarthy, G. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22467 · Cited by 67
“We have proposed that the face-specific N200 generated in the FG is an obligatory response to faces, which accounts for its general insensitivity when challenged with cognitive and perceptual manipulations [Allison et al., 1999; Engell and McCarthy, 2010, 2011; Puce et al., 1999].”
BackgroundBigman, Z., & Pratt, H. (2004) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2003.10.003 · Cited by 61
Faces in context: Modulation of expression processing by situational information
Diéguez-Risco, T., Aguado, L., Albert, J., & Hinojosa, J. A. (2013) · Social Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/17470919.2013.834842 · Cited by 60
Tarkiainen, A., Helenius, P., & Salmelin, R. H. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00161-7 · Cited by 60
Object repetition leads to local increases in the temporal coordination of neural responses
Gilbert, J. R. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00030 · Cited by 58
Jonas, J., Frismand, S., Vignal, J., Colnat‐Coulbois, S., Koessler, L., Vespignani, H., Rossion, B., & Maillard, L. G. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22407 · Cited by 59
“Stimulations of the temporal lobe evoked either complex hallucinations [Ishibashi et al., 1964, Lee et al., 2000, Puce et al., 1999], visual illusions [Lee et al., 2000], or no detectable percept or elementary hallucinations [Murphey et al., 2009].”
The effect of face inversion on intracranial and scalp recordings of event-related potentials
Rosburg, T., Ludowig, E., mpelmann, M. D. ⁄., Alba‐Ferrara, L., Urbach, H., & Elger, C. E. (2009) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00881.x · Cited by 64
Pourtois, G., Spinelli, L., Seeck, M., & Vuilleumier, P. O. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21404 · Cited by 62
“, typical sequence of P150/N200/P290 waveforms, followed by a prolonged N700) between our findings (see Figure 3) and earlier intracranial ERP results obtained in other epileptic patients (see Allison et al., 1999; McCarthy et al., 1999; Puce et al., 1999).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFamiliar Face Detection in 180ms
Castello, M. V. D. O., & Gobbini, M. I. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0136548 · Cited by 62
“The earliest face-specific evoked potential—not driven by low-level features—peaks at around 170ms from stimulus onset (the N170 in EEG [13,53–55] and the M170 in MEG [48,49].”
BackgroundSchendan, H. E., & Lucia, L. C. (2010) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.01.062 · Cited by 59
“Further, occipitotemporal cortex, where the intracranial N200 is recorded, also shows later P290 and N700 waves that may reflect re-entrant input to the same cells (Allison et al., 1999, 2002; Puce et al., 1999), consistent with an interactive state 2 during the N3.”
Jacques, C., Jonas, J., Maillard, L., Colnat-Coulbois, S., Koessler, L., & Rossion, B. (2018) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.24455 · Cited by 58
Iidaka, T., Matsumoto, A., Haneda, K., Okada, T., & Sadato, N. (2006) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2005.11.004 · Cited by 57
Lotze, M., Reimold, M., Heymans, U., Laihinen, A., Patt, M., & Halsband, U. (2008) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21087 · Cited by 56
“The STS receives axons from and sends projections into the amygdala and the VLPFC (Rolls, 2000; Puce, Allison, & McCarthy, 1999 ).”
BackgroundLooking for faces: Attention modulates early occipitotemporal object processing
Lueschow, A., Sander, T. H., Boehm, S. G., Nolte, G., Trahms, L., & Curio, G. (2004) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00159.x · Cited by 53
“Possible Relation of the Attentional Modulation to the N200 The early attentional modulation of face processing peaks at 208 ms. This suggests a possible link to the face-specific N200 characterized in intracranial recordings from occipitotemporal cortex (Allison, Puce, Spencer, & McCarthy, 1999; McCarthy, Puce, Belge…”
BackgroundEvent-Related Potentials Related to Normal and Morphed Emotional Faces
Balconi, M., & Lucchiari, C. (2005) · The Journal of Psychology · doi:10.3200/jrlp.139.2.176-192 · Cited by 56
Regional Brain Activation Evoked When Approaching a Virtual Human on a Virtual Walk
Morris, J. P., Pelphrey, K. A., & McCarthy, G. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892905774589253 · Cited by 55
“For example, subdural electrical recordings (Allison, Puce, Spencer, & McCarthy, 1999; McCarthy, Puce, Belger, & Allison, 1999; Puce, Allison, & McCarthy, 1999; Allison, Ginter, et al., 1994) and functional neuroimaging studies (Grill-Spector, Knouf, & Kanwisher, 2004; Kanwisher, McDermott, & Chun, 1997; McCarthy, Puc…”
Top-down and bottom-up modulation in processing bimodal face/voice stimuli
Latinus, M., Rufin Vanrullen, A., & Taylor, M. J. (2010) · BMC Neuroscience · doi:10.1186/1471-2202-11-36 · Cited by 55
“The N170 component is sensitive to a range of manipulations of faces [29-32] suggesting that it reflects automatic face processing [33,34].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Puce, A.
- Affiliations
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- Corresponding author
- Puce, A.
- ORCID
- Puce, A.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-07-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 445-458
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2151799366
- Cited by
- 422
- References
- 89
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 15
- FWCI
- 11.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH-05 286, R01MH005286)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Keywords
- face perception, top-down processing, N2 component, P350, semantic priming, habituation, cortical stimulation, face hallucination, face recognition (cognition), ventral occipitotemporal cortex, intracranial recordings
- MeSH terms
- Arousal, Cerebral Cortex, Electric Stimulation, Emotions, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Facial Expression, Form Perception, Habituation, Psychophysiologic, Humans, Mental Processes, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Semantics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review