Cited by 94Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsVisual perception and processing mechanisms

Electrical stimulation of visual cortex: relevance for the development of visual cortical prosthetics

Open access
Bosking, William H., Beauchamp, Michael S., Yoshor, Daniel·2017·Annual Review of Vision Science

Abstract

Electrical stimulation of the cerebral cortex is a powerful tool for exploring cortical function. Stimulation of early visual cortical areas is easily detected by subjects and produces simple visual percepts known as phosphenes. A device implanted in visual cortex that generates patterns of phosphenes could be used as a substitute for natural vision in blind patients. We review the possibilities and limitations of such a device, termed a visual cortical prosthetic. Currently, we can predict the location and size of phosphenes produced by stimulation of single electrodes. A functional prosthetic, however, must produce spatial temporal patterns of activity that will result in the perception of complex visual objects. Although stimulation of later visual cortical areas alone usually does not lead to a visual percept, it can alter visual perception and the performance of visual behaviors, and training subjects to use signals injected into these areas may be possible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-vision-111815-114525

Cites

121 of 121 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our simulator is the first to incorporate empirical models of current spread in cortical tissue to simulate the effects of stimulation current on phosphene size.

    “However, our simulator is the first to incorporate empirical models of the current spread in cortical tissue (Tehovnik and Slocum, 2007; Winawer and Parvizi, 2016; Bosking et al., 2017) to simulate the effects of stimulation current on the phosphene size.”

    From Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses (2024) · cites this paper as Bosking et al., 2017

    In 'Electrical Stimulation in Epilepsy Patients' (page unavailable), the paper describes a model predicting phosphene size from stimulation-current magnitude and electrode eccentricity. 'Measuring Spread of Activity and Cortical Integration with Electrical Stimulation' (page unavailable) separately discusses empirical measurements and an equation for current spread. Our copy does not establish that the phosphene-size model incorporates an empirical model of current spread; the citing authors' claim that their simulator is the first to do so is their own, not a claim attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The size of the phosphene increases with its eccentricity due to cortical magnification.

    “Due to the cortical magnification (the foveal information is represented by a relatively large surface area in the visual cortex as a result of variation of retinal RF size) the size of the phosphene increases with its eccentricity (Winawer and Parvizi, 2016; Bosking et al., 2017).”
  • Some recent studies developed descriptive models of the phosphene size or brightness as a function of the stimulation parameters.

    “Some recent studies developed descriptive models of the phosphene size or brightness as a function of the stimulation parameters (Winawer and Parvizi, 2016; Bosking et al., 2017).”
  • More elongated and more complex phosphene shapes have been reported.

    “However, more elongated shapes and more complex shapes have been reported as well (Bosking et al., 2017; Winawer and Parvizi, 2016; Bak et al., 1990).”

    From Towards biologically plausible phosphene simulation for the differentiable optimization of visual cortical prostheses (2024) · cites this paper as Bosking et al., 2017

    The sections on stimulation in epilepsy patients and on phosphene characteristics in nonhuman primates discuss phosphene size, color, and contrast, but do not report elongated or complex phosphene shapes. A reference to a more complex visual percept is hypothetical, not a report of such a shape. Searches for elongated shapes and complex phosphene forms found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were unavailable. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The model replicates data from Bosking et al. examining phosphene size as a function of eccentricity for 93 surface electrodes implanted in 13 patients.

    “Our model also replicates data from Bosking et al.71 who examined phosphene size as a function of eccentricity for 93 surface electrodes (0.25 mm radius) implanted in 13 patients.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bosking, W. H., Beauchamp, M. S., & Yoshor, D.
Affiliations
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Venue
Annual Review of Vision Science
Published
2017-09-15
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
141-166
ISSN
  • 2374-4642 (ISSN-L)
  • 2374-4650
OpenAlex
W2248803695
Cited by
93
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annual Review of Vision Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (I01 CX001122)
  • National Eye Institute (R01EY023336)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
Keywords
phosphenes, visual prosthesis, blindness, visual perception, cortical plasticity, visual behavior
MeSH terms
Animals, Blindness, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Humans, Phosphenes, Primates, Visual Cortex, Visual Perception, Visual Prosthesis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review