Cited by 78Face Recognition and PerceptionVisual perception and processing mechanismsFace recognition and analysis

Probabilistic atlases for face and biological motion perception: An analysis of their reliability and overlap

Open access
Engell, Andrew D., McCarthy, Gregory·2013·NeuroImage

Abstract

Neuroimaging research has identified several category-selective regions in visual cortex that respond most strongly when viewing an exemplar image from a preferred category, such as faces. Recent studies, however, have suggested a more complex pattern of activation that has been heretofore unrecognized, e.g., the presence of additional patches of activation to faces beyond the well-studied fusiform face area, and the activation of ostensible face selective regions by animate motion of non-biological forms. Here, we characterize the spatial pattern of brain activity evoked by viewing faces or biological motion in large fMRI samples (N>120). We create probabilistic atlases for both face and biological motion activation, and directly compare their spatial patterns of activation. Our findings support the suggestion that the fusiform face area is composed of at least two separable foci of activation. The face-evoked response in the fusiform and nearby ventral temporal cortex has good reliability across runs; however, we found surprisingly high variability in lateral brain regions by faces, and for all brain regions by biological motion, which had an overall much lower effect size. We found that faces and biological motion evoke substantially overlapping activation distributions in both ventral and lateral occipitotemporal cortices. The peaks of activation for these different categories within these overlapping regions were close but distinct.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.02.025

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Biological Motion task also engaged regions associated with motion, body form, and face processing.

    “For example, the Biological Motion task also engaged regions associated with motion, body form, and face processing (Engell and McCarthy 2013)”

    From Functional Heterogeneity and Convergence in the Right Temporoparietal Junction (2016) · cites this paper as Engell and McCarthy 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 80 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Duncan KJ Pattamadilok C Knierim I Devlin JT 2009 Consistency and variability in functional localisers Neuroimage 46 4 1018 1026 19289173 PMC2686646
  2. Kriegeskorte N Mur M Bandettini P 2008 Representational similarity analysis-connecting the branches of systems neuroscience Front Syst Neurosci 2 4 19104670 PMC2605405
  3. Peelen MV Wiggett AJ Downing PE 2006 Patterns of fMRI activity dissociate overlapping functional brain areas that respond to biological motion Neuron 49 6 815 22 16543130
  4. Rossion B Hanseeuw B Dricot L 2012 Defining face perception areas in the human brain: a large-scale factorial fMRI face localizer analysis Brain Cogn 79 2 138 57 22330606

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Engell, A. D., & McCarthy, G.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Gregory
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-07
Volume
74
Pages
140-151
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158945389
Cited by
77
References
80
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 1
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Kenyon (Kenyon College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-093986, MH-05286)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-41328)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face perception, biological motion perception, probabilistic atlases, fusiform face area, category-selective regions, face-selective regions, ventral temporal cortex, occipitotemporal cortex, functional MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Atlases as Topic, Brain, Brain Mapping, Face, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motion Perception, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review