The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences in Error Processing: A Review and Reanalysis of Three Event-related fMRI Studies Using the GO/NOGO Task
Open accessAbstract
Three previous studies using the GO/NOGO task were examined to characterize the pattern of functional activation seen during error-related processing. The large sample size (n = 44) also allowed investigation of the influence of individual differences in age, sex, self-reported absentmindedness and reaction speed on the level of activation. Errors were seen to activate a network of regions including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA), bilateral insula, thalamus and right inferior parietal lobule. Split-half comparisons performed for each of the individual difference variables indicated greater ACC and pre-SMA activation for older subjects while slower responders showed greater activation in the parietal, lateral PFC, insula and ACC regions. Whereas males and females demonstrated equivalent levels of activation in both the ACC and insula, self-reported absentmindedness related to reduced activation in these regions. Our review of the current imaging literature on error-related activation indicates that, despite the use of a variety of other cognitive paradigms, the network of regions identified here is consistent with these previous studies, suggesting that these regions are critical to a 'general' error-related response. Furthermore, this response is, in part, influenced by individual differences in both demographic characteristics and behavioural performance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages
Cox, R. W. (1996) · Computers and Biomedical Research · doi:10.1006/cbmr.1996.0014 · Cited by 10,913
Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex
Bush, G., Luu, P., & Posner, M. I. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01483-2 · Cited by 6,259
Anterior Cingulate Cortex, Error Detection, and the Online Monitoring of Performance
Carter, C. S., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Botvinick, M. M., Noll, D., & Cohen, J. D. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.747 · Cited by 3,273
The anterior cingulate as a conflict monitor: fMRI and ERP studies
VANVEEN, V, & CARTER, C. (2002) · Physiology & Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00930-7 · Cited by 1,258 · cited 1×
“…ACC functions to detect conflict, rather than, or in addition to, Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article-abstract/14/9/986/360581 by guest on 24 April 2018 Cerebral Cortex September 2004, V 14 N 9 987 errors (Carter et al., 1998; Botvinick et al., 2001; van Veen and Carter, 2002).”
BackgroundNeural mechanisms of general fluid intelligence
Gray, J. R., Chabris, C. F., & Braver, T. S. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1014 · Cited by 1,080
Anterior Cingulate Cortex and Response Conflict: Effects of Frequency, Inhibition and Errors
Braver, T. S. (2001) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/11.9.825 · Cited by 1,016
Age differences in the frontal lateralization of verbal and spatial working memory revealed by PET
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Jonides, J., Smith, E. E., Hartley, A., Miller, A., Marshuetz, C., & Koeppe, R. A. (2000) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/089892900561814 · Cited by 998
Garavan, H. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1326 · Cited by 988
Self-citationAction-Monitoring Dysfunction in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Gehring, W. J., Himle, J., & Nisenson, L. G. (2000) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00206 · Cited by 670
An fMRI Study of Sex Differences in Regional Activation to a Verbal and a Spatial Task
Gur, R. C., Alsop, D., Glahn, D., Petty, R., Swanson, C. L., Maldjian, J. A., Turetsky, B. I., Detre, J. A., Gee, J., & Gur, R. E. (2000) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2325 · Cited by 352 · cited 3×
“…demonstrated, primarily in the literature utilizing cognitiveemotional judgment tasks (Schneider et al., 2000; Killgore et al., 2001; Killgore and Yurgelun-Todd, 2001; Lee et al., 2002), though not exclusively (Schlosser et al., 1998; Gur et al., 2000; Jordan et al., 2002; Rossell et al., 2002).”
Background
Cited by
The role of the medial frontal cortex in cognitive control
Ridderinkhof, K. R., Ullsperger, M., Crone, E. A., & Nieuwenhuis, S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100301 · Cited by 2,974
Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Segalowitz, S. J., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Brain and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.09.016 · Cited by 1,407
Wessel, J. R., & Aron, A. R. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.013 · Cited by 409
Role of the anterior insula in task-level control and focal attention
Nelson, S. M., Dosenbach, N. U. F., Cohen, A. L., Wheeler, M. E., Schlaggar, B. L., & Petersen, S. E. (2010) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-010-0260-2 · Cited by 435
Bellgrove, M. A., Hester, R., & Garavan, H. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.05.007 · Cited by 445
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hester, R.
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-04-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 986-994
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2168914261
- Cited by
- 319
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Differences in Error Processing: A Review and Reanalysis of Three Event-related fMRI Studies Using the GO/NOGO Task. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cercor/bhh059
- The paper
- Hester, R. (2004). Individual Differences in Error Processing: A Review and Reanalysis of Three Event-related fMRI Studies Using the GO/NOGO Task. Cerebral Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhh059
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
