The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Frontostriatal Microstructure Modulates Efficient Recruitment of Cognitive Control
Abstract
Many studies have linked activity in a frontostriatal network with the capacity to suppress inappropriate thoughts and actions, but relatively few have examined the role of connectivity between these structures. Here, we use diffusion tensor imaging to assess frontostriatal connectivity in 21 subjects (ages 7-31 years). Fifteen subjects were tested on a go/no-go task, where they responded with a button press to a visual stimulus and inhibited a response to a second infrequent stimulus. An automated fiber tracking algorithm was used to delineate white matter fibers adjacent to ventral prefrontal cortex and the striatum, and the corticospinal tract, which was not expected to contribute to control per se. Diffusion in frontostriatal and corticospinal tracts became more restricted with age. This shift was paralleled by an increase in efficiency of task performance. Frontostriatal radial diffusivities predicted faster reaction times, independent of age and accuracy, and this correlation grew stronger for trials expected to require greater control. This was not observed in the corticospinal tract. On trials matched for speed of task performance, adults were significantly more accurate, and accuracies were correlated with frontostriatal, but not corticospinal, diffusivities. These findings suggest that frontostriatal connectivity may contribute to developmental and individual differences in the efficient recruitment of cognitive control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These neurobiological changes underlie the profound maturation in motivational and cognitive domains across adolescence [30–34]”
From Adolescent nicotine exposure and persistent neurocircuitry changes: unveiling lifelong psychiatric risks (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Using a similar approach, Liston and colleagues (2006) have shown that white matter tracts between prefrontal–basal ganglia and posterior fiber tracts continue to develop across childhood into adulthood, but only tracts between the prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia are correlated with impulse control, as measured by performance on a go/no-go task.”
From The Adolescent Brain (2008) · cites this paper as Liston et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“Consistent with several studies (53), there was a significant correlation between SSRT and right IFG -striatum tract strength ( r = -0.31, P = 0.045) but, importantly, not with structural and functional connectivity of the right dlPFC -striatum ( r = -0.15, P = 0.33, and r = 0.06, P = 0.66, respectively; Fig. S2).”
From Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity (2015) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Consistent with several studies (53), there was a significant correlation between SSRT and right IFG -striatum tract strength ( r = -0.31, P = 0.045) but, importantly, not with structural and functional connectivity of the right dlPFC -striatum ( r = -0.15, P = 0.33, and r = 0.06, P = 0.66, respectively; Fig. S2).”
From Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity (2015) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“Consistent with several studies (53), there was a significant correlation between SSRT and right IFG -striatum tract strength ( r = -0.31, P = 0.045) but, importantly, not with structural and functional connectivity of the right dlPFC -striatum ( r = -0.15, P = 0.33, and r = 0.06, P = 0.66, respectively; Fig. S2).”
From Adolescent impatience decreases with increased frontostriatal connectivity (2015) · cites this paper as [53]
In the citing paper
“functional connectivity studies suggest that the integration and coordination between brain regions, including subcortical to cortical connections, become more refined and efficient over adolescence, leading to reduced task-irrelevant connections, strengthening of connections supporting goal-directed actions, and elimination of redundant connections (Durston, Davidson et al. 2006; Liston, Watts et”
From Developmental imaging genetics: Linking dopamine function to adolescent behavior (2014) · cites this paper as Liston, Watts et al. 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An Integrative Theory of Prefrontal Cortex Function
Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167 · Cited by 12,803
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood
Gogtay, N., Giedd, J. N., Lusk, L., Hayashi, K. M., Greenstein, D., Vaituzis, A. C., Nugent, T. F., Herman, D. H., Clasen, L. S., Toga, A. W., et al. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0402680101 · Cited by 5,604 · cited 1×
“…as measured histologically (Conel, 1939--1963; Yakovlev and LeCours, 1967; Huttenlocher, 1979) and indexed by imaging methods (Sowell et al., 1999, 2003, 2004; Klingberg et al., 1999; Paus et al., 2001; Giedd, 2004; Gogtay et al., 2004) proceeds slowly throughout late childhood and adolescence.”
MethodAnterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089910 · Cited by 2,891
Diffusion tensor MR imaging of the human brain
Pierpaoli, C., Jezzard, P., Basser, P. J., Barnett, A., & Di Chiro, G. (1996) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiology.201.3.8939209 · Cited by 2,664
Synaptic density in human frontal cortex —Developmental changes and effects of aging
Peter R., H. (1979) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0006-8993(79)90349-4 · Cited by 2,645
Comparing correlated correlation coefficients
Meng, X.-L., Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.172 · Cited by 2,472
Mapping cortical change across the human life span
Sowell, E. R., Peterson, B. S., Thompson, P. M., Welcome, S. E., Henkenius, A. L., & Toga, A. W. (2003) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1008 · Cited by 2,328
The Architecture of Cognitive Control in the Human Prefrontal Cortex
Koechlin, É., Ody, C., & Kouneiher, F. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1088545 · Cited by 1,939
Tracking neuronal fiber pathways in the living human brain
Conturo, T. E., Lori, N. F., Cull, T. S., Akbudak, E., Snyder, A. Z., Shimony, J. S., McKinstry, R. C., Burton, H., & Raichle, M. E. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.18.10422 · Cited by 1,774
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A social neuroscience perspective on adolescent risk-taking
Steinberg, L. (2008) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.002 · Cited by 3,644
Casey, B. J., Jones, R. M., & Hare, T. A. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.010 · Cited by 3,345
Self-citationA Developmental Perspective on Executive Function
Best, J. R., & Miller, P. H. (2010) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01499.x · Cited by 2,692
(2009) · Cited by 2,013
Casey, B. J., Getz, S., & Galvan, A. (2008) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2007.08.003 · Cited by 1,810
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Liston, C., Watts, R., Tottenham, N., Davidson, M. C., Niogi, S., Ulug, A. M., & Casey, B. J.
- Affiliations
- Cornell University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Liston, Conor
- Venue
- Cerebral Cortex
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-07-20
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 553-560
- ISSN
- 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2199
- OpenAlex
- W2137938217
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 59
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 73 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 9.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH063255, R01 MH 63255, R01MH091864, P01 MH 62196)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (R21 DA 15882, R21DA015882)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 07739, T32GM007739)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Keywords
- frontostriatal connectivity, cognitive control, white matter microstructure, radial diffusivity, go/no-go task, response inhibition, ventral prefrontal cortex, striatum, corticospinal tract, developmental changes, individual differences, diffusion tensor imaging, tractography
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aging, Brain Mapping, Child, Cognition, Corpus Striatum, Discrimination Learning, Female, Humans, Male, Neural Pathways, Psychomotor Performance, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
