Cited by 138Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismMemory Processes and InfluencesFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies

Modality-Independent Decoding of Semantic Information from the Human Brain

Open access
Simanova, Irina, Hagoort, Peter, Oostenveld, Robert, van Gerven, Marcel A. J.·2014·Cerebral Cortex

Abstract

An ability to decode semantic information from fMRI spatial patterns has been demonstrated in previous studies mostly for 1 specific input modality. In this study, we aimed to decode semantic category independent of the modality in which an object was presented. Using a searchlight method, we were able to predict the stimulus category from the data while participants performed a semantic categorization task with 4 stimulus modalities (spoken and written names, photographs, and natural sounds). Significant classification performance was achieved in all 4 modalities. Modality-independent decoding was implemented by training and testing the searchlight method across modalities. This allowed the localization of those brain regions, which correctly discriminated between the categories, independent of stimulus modality. The analysis revealed large clusters of voxels in the left inferior temporal cortex and in frontal regions. These voxels also allowed category discrimination in a free recall session where subjects recalled the objects in the absence of external stimuli. The results show that semantic information can be decoded from the fMRI signal independently of the input modality and have clear implications for understanding the functional mechanisms of semantic memory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cercor/bhs324

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When able speakers imagine speaking or hearing a word, neural activity in the STG can be used to decode those words with above-chance accuracy.

    “Along these lines, when able speakers are instructed to imagine speaking or hearing a word, neural activity in the STG can be used to decode those words with above-chance accuracy59–63.”

    From The speech neuroprosthesis (2024) · cites this paper as [63]

    The Searchlight Results (p. 5) identify STG voxels that distinguish semantic categories when participants were presented with spoken or written words. But the Experimental Design (p. 3) describes covert recall of category exemplars, not instructions to imagine speaking or hearing a word; the paper reports decoding animal-versus-tool categories, not individual imagined words. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Simanova, I., Hagoort, P., Oostenveld, R., & van Gerven, M. A. J.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Simanova, Irina
Venue
Cerebral Cortex
Published
2012-10-12
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
426-434
ISSN
  • 1047-3211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2199
OpenAlex
W2159295653
Cited by
138
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3
FWCI
3.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cerebral Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Keywords
semantic decoding, semantic memory, semantic classification, object recognition, photographs, natural sounds, inferior temporal cortex, frontal cortex, free recall, brain-computer interface
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Perception, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Imagination, Judgment, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Names, Reading, Mental Recall, Semantics, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Speech Perception, Visual Perception, Young Adult, Support Vector Machine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review