Cited by 52Biochemical Analysis and Sensing TechniquesSensory Analysis and Statistical MethodsOlfactory and Sensory Function Studies

An assessment of binary mixture interactions for nine sweeteners

Frank, Robert A., Mize, Sara Jane S., Carter, Ross·1989·Chemical Senses

Abstract

Binary mixtures of acesulfame K, aspartame, sodium cyclamate, fructose, glucose, stevioside, sodium saccharin, sucrose and xylitol were assessed using factorial mixture designs. A simple additive model was used to generate predictions for the sweetness of the mixtures and these predicted responses were compared to the observed sweetness ratings of the mixtures. It was found that the mixtures tended to exhibit superadditivity at low concentrations, additivity at intermediate concentrations and subadditivity at high concentrations. Synergistic and suppressive effects in the mixtures were evaluated by comparing mixture responses to the sweetness ratings of ‘self-mixtures’. Self-mixture data were generated by treating a mixture of a substance with itself as if it were a mixture of two different substances. Synergism was defined as a mixture response that was greater than the sweetness of the component self-mixtures, and suppression was defined as a mixture response that was less than the sweetness of the component self-mixtures. Of the 31 binary mixtures studied, 18 showed synergism, two showed suppression and 11 did not differ significantly from their components. It is hypothesized that multiple sweetness receptors or release from bitter suppression may account for the synergistic effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/chemse/14.5.621

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The perception of sweetness in mixtures of aspartame and acesulfame K has been extensively investigated and the two sweeteners have demonstrated a perceptual synergy when mixed.

    “For instance, the perception of sweetness in mixtures of aspartame and acesulfame K hasbeenextensivelyinvestigated and the two sweeteners have demonstrated a perceptual synergy when mixed [32,114,115].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Frank, R. A., Mize, S. J. S., & Carter, R.
Affiliations
University of Cincinnati (US)
Venue
Chemical Senses
Published
1989
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
621-632
ISSN
  • 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-3553
OpenAlex
W2080910555
Cited by
52
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Senses (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ohio Board of Regents
  • Louisiana Board of Regents
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Sensory Analysis and Statistical Methods
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
Keywords
sweetener mixtures, binary mixtures, acesulfame-K, aspartame, sodium cyclamate, fructose, glucose, stevioside, sodium saccharin, sucrose, xylitol, sweetness perception, superadditivity, subadditivity, synergistic effect, suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review