The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Emotional Distinctiveness of Odor-evoked Memories
Abstract
A modified paired-associate learning paradigm was used to test whether odors or verbal odor labels evoked more emotional memories. Subjects were presented with emotionally positive and negative paintings (to-be-remembered items) in association with positive and negative odors and odor labels. Painting recall and associated emotional experience were tested after 48 h. Odor-evoked memories were found to be more emotional than verbally cued memories on a variety of measures. Moreover, if the cue for recall (odor or label) was hedonically congruent with the painting to be remembered, memory for original emotional experiences was enhanced. The findings are discussed within a general cognitive framework and implications for using odors to dissociate the emotional and representational aspects of memory are addressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Bower, G. H. (1981) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.36.2.129 · Cited by 4,154
Cited by
Odor memory: Review and analysis
Herz, R. S., & Engen, T. (1996) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03210754 · Cited by 507
Self-citationAn Odor is Not Worth a Thousand Words: From Multidimensional Odors to Unidimensional Odor Objects
Yeshurun, Y., & Sobel, N. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163639 · Cited by 485
The Role of Odor-Evoked Memory in Psychological and Physiological Health
Herz, R. (2016) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci6030022 · Cited by 310
Self-citationNeuroimaging evidence for the emotional potency of odor-evoked memory
Herz, R. S., Eliassen, J., Beland, S., & Souza, T. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.08.009 · Cited by 265
Self-citationOlfaction and emotion: the case of autobiographical memory
Willander, J., & Larsson, M. (2007) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03193499 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Herz, R. S., & Cupchik, G. C.
- Venue
- Chemical Senses
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 517-528
- ISSN
- 0379-864X (ISSN-L)
- 1464-3553
- OpenAlex
- W2001435497
- Cited by
- 250
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 1.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Emotional Distinctiveness of Odor-evoked Memories. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/chemse/20.5.517
- The paper
- Herz, R. S., & Cupchik, G. C. (1995). The Emotional Distinctiveness of Odor-evoked Memories. Chemical Senses. https://doi.org/10.1093/chemse/20.5.517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
