Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 481

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Coronavirus 2019

Open access
Luo, Xiaomin, Zhou, Wei, Yan, Xiaojie, Guo, Tangxi, Wang, Benchao, Xia, Hongxia, Ye, Lu, Xiong, Jun, Jiang, Zongping, Liu, Yu, Zhang, Bicheng, Yang, Weize·2020·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: An elevated serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level was observed in most patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methods: Data for COVID-19 patients with clinical outcome in a designated hospital in Wuhan, China, were retrospectively collected and analyzed from 30 January 2020 to 20 February 2020. The prognostic value of admission CRP was evaluated in patients with COVID-19. Results: Of 298 patients enrolled, 84 died and 214 recovered. Most nonsurvivors were male, older, or with chronic diseases. Compared with survivors, nonsurvivors showed significantly elevated white blood cell and neutrophil counts, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), systemic immune inflammation index (defined by platelet count multiplied by NLR), CRP, procalcitonin, and D-dimer and showed decreased red blood cell, lymphocyte, and platelet counts. Age, neutrophil count, platelet count, and CRP were identified as independent predictors of adverse outcome. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of CRP (0.896) was significantly higher than that of age (0.833), neutrophil count (0.820), and platelet count (0.678) in outcome prediction (all P < .05). With a cutoff value of 41.4, CRP exhibited sensitivity of 90.5%, specificity of 77.6%, positive predictive value of 61.3%, and negative predictive value of 95.4%. CRP was also an independent discriminator of severe/critical illness on admission with an AUC (0.783) comparable to age (0.828) and neutrophil count (0.729) (both P > .05). Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19, admission CRP correlated with disease severity and tended to be a good predictor of adverse outcome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciaa641

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 481

Metadata

Authors
Luo, X., Zhou, W., Yan, X., Guo, T., Wang, B., Xia, H., Ye, L., Xiong, J., Jiang, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, B., & Yang, W.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2020-05-23
Volume
71
Issue
16
Pages
2174-2179
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3027456712
Cited by
481
References
4
FWCI
12.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Coronavirus 2019. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/ciaa641
The paper
Luo, X., Zhou, W., Yan, X., Guo, T., Wang, B., Xia, H., Ye, L., Xiong, J., Jiang, Z., Liu, Y., Zhang, B., & Yang, W. (2020). Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in Patients With Coronavirus 2019. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa641

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.