Cited by 113SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchAnimal Virus Infections StudiesCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neutralizing Antibodies Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Variants Induced by Natural Infection or Vaccination: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Recently emerged severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants may pose a threat to immunity. A systematic landscape of neutralizing antibodies against emerging variants is needed. We systematically searched for studies that evaluated neutralizing antibody titers induced by previous infection or vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 variants and collected individual data. We identified 106 studies meeting the eligibility criteria. Lineage B.1.351 (beta), P.1 (gamma) and B.1.617.2 (delta) significantly escaped natural infection–mediated neutralization, with an average of 4.1-fold (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.6–4.7-fold), 1.8-fold (1.4–2.4-fold), and 3.2-fold (2.4–4.1-fold) reduction in live virus neutralization assay, while neutralizing titers against B.1.1.7 (alpha) decreased slightly (1.4-fold [95% CI: 1.2–1.6-fold]). Serum from vaccinees also led to significant reductions in neutralization of B.1.351 across different platforms, with an average of 7.1-fold (95% CI: 5.5–9.0-fold) for nonreplicating vector platform, 4.1-fold (3.7–4.4-fold) for messenger RNA platform, and 2.5-fold (1.7–2.9-fold) for protein subunit platform. Neutralizing antibody levels induced by messenger RNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 variants were similar to, or higher, than that derived from naturally infected individuals.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciab646

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 52 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chen, X., Chen, Z., Azman, A. S., Sun, R., Lu, W., Zheng, N., Zhou, J., Wu, Q., Deng, X., Zhao, Z., Chen, X., Ge, S., Yang, J., Leung, D. T., & Yu, H.
Affiliations
  • Fudan University (CN)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Yu, Hongjie
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2021-07-24
Volume
74
Issue
4
Pages
734-742
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W3183560460
Cited by
113
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 52 · 2021: 23
FWCI
2.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (81525023)
  • Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader (18XD1400300)
  • National Science and Technology Major Project (2018ZX10713001-007, 2017ZX10103009-005, 2018ZX10201001-010)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 AI135115)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2 variants, neutralizing antibodies, antibody escape, natural infection, COVID-19 vaccines, mRNA vaccines, vector vaccines, subunit vaccine, neutralization titers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review