Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 343

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the 2011–2012 Season: Protection Against Each Circulating Virus and the Effect of Prior Vaccination on Estimates

Open access
Ohmit, Suzanne E., Thompson, Mark G., Petrie, Joshua G., Thaker, Swathi N., Jackson, Michael L., Belongia, Edward A., Zimmerman, Richard K., Gaglani, Manjusha, Lamerato, Lois, Spencer, Sarah M., Jackson, Lisa, Meece, Jennifer K., Nowalk, Mary Patricia, Song, Juhee, Zervos, Marcus, Cheng, Po-Yung, Rinaldo, Charles R., Clipper, Lydia, Shay, David K., Piedra, Pedro, Monto, Arnold S.·2014·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Each year, the US Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness Network examines the effectiveness of influenza vaccines in preventing medically attended acute respiratory illnesses caused by influenza. METHODS: Patients with acute respiratory illnesses of ≤ 7 days' duration were enrolled at ambulatory care facilities in 5 communities. Specimens were collected and tested for influenza by real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. Receipt of influenza vaccine was defined based on documented evidence of vaccination in medical records or immunization registries. Vaccine effectiveness was estimated in adjusted logistic regression models by comparing the vaccination coverage in those who tested positive for influenza with those who tested negative. RESULTS: The 2011-2012 season was mild and peaked late, with circulation of both type A viruses and both lineages of type B. Overall adjusted vaccine effectiveness was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36-56) in preventing medically attended influenza; vaccine effectiveness was 65% (95% CI, 44-79) against type A (H1N1) pdm09 but only 39% (95% CI, 23-52) against type A (H3N2). Estimates of vaccine effectiveness against both type B lineages were similar (overall, 58%; 95% CI, 35-73). An apparent negative effect of prior year vaccination on current year effectiveness estimates was noted, particularly for A (H3N2) outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine effectiveness in the 2011-2012 season was modest overall, with lower effectiveness against the predominant A (H3N2) virus. This may be related to antigenic drift, but past history of vaccination might also play a role.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cit736

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 343

Metadata

Authors
Ohmit, S. E., Thompson, M. G., Petrie, J. G., Thaker, S. N., Jackson, M. L., Belongia, E. A., Zimmerman, R. K., Gaglani, M., Lamerato, L., Spencer, S. M., Jackson, L., Meece, J. K., Nowalk, M. P., Song, J., Zervos, M., Cheng, P.-Y., Rinaldo, C. R., Clipper, L., Shay, D. K., Piedra, P., & Monto, A. S.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2013-11-13
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
319-327
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2072656136
Cited by
343
References
3
FWCI
22.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the 2011–2012 Season: Protection Against Each Circulating Virus and the Effect of Prior Vaccination on Estimates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cid/cit736
The paper
Ohmit, S. E., Thompson, M. G., Petrie, J. G., Thaker, S. N., Jackson, M. L., Belongia, E. A., Zimmerman, R. K., Gaglani, M., Lamerato, L., Spencer, S. M., Jackson, L., Meece, J. K., Nowalk, M. P., Song, J., Zervos, M., Cheng, P.-Y., Rinaldo, C. R., Clipper, L., Shay, D. K., . . . Monto, A. S. (2014). Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the 2011–2012 Season: Protection Against Each Circulating Virus and the Effect of Prior Vaccination on Estimates. Clinical Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cit736

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.