Cited by 129Antibiotic Use and ResistanceBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

Diagnostic Stewardship: Opportunity for a Laboratory–Infectious Diseases Partnership

Open access
Patel, Robin, Fang, Ferric C·2018·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Recent advances in microbial diagnostics are providing clinicians with information about microbes causing infections and their resistance to antimicrobial agents more rapidly than ever before. Diagnostic stewardship refers to the appropriate use of laboratory testing to guide patient management, including treatment, in order to optimize clinical outcomes and limit the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Fulfilling the promise of diagnostic stewardship requires a seamless partnership between clinical laboratories, pharmacists, and infectious diseases clinicians, so that appropriate tests are ordered and diagnostic information is translated into appropriate management in real time.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciy077

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bauer KA, West JE, Balada-Llasat JM, Pancholi P, Stevenson KB, Goff DA. An antimicrobial stewardship program's impact with rapid polymerase chain reac- tion methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus/S. aureus blood culture test in patients with S. aureus bacteremia. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51:1074-80.
  2. Sautter RL, Thomson RB Jr. Consolidated clinical microbiology laboratories. J Clin Microbiol 2015; 53:1467-72.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patel, R., & Fang, F. C.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Patel, Robin
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2018-03-14
Volume
67
Issue
5
Pages
799-801
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2794388430
Cited by
127
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 2
FWCI
8.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Institutes of Health (UM1 AI104681, R01 AR056647, R21 AI125870)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (R01 AR056647)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
diagnostic stewardship, antimicrobial resistance, clinical laboratory, pharmacists, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, clinical management
MeSH terms
Antimicrobial Stewardship, Anti-Infective Agents, Communicable Diseases, Drug Utilization, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Patients, Clinical Laboratory Techniques, Molecular Diagnostic Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review