Cited by 81Sepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentAntibiotics Pharmacokinetics and EfficacyEmergency and Acute Care Studies

Infectious diseases team for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.

Open access
Viale, Pierluigi, Tedeschi, Sara, Scudeller, Luigia, Attard, Luciano, Badia, Lorenzo, Bartoletti, Michele, Cascavilla, Alessandra, Cristini, Francesco +13 more·2017·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Background: The impact on patient survival of an infectious disease (ID) team dedicated to the early management of severe sepsis/septic shock (SS/SS) in Emergency Department (ED) has yet to be assessed. Methods: A quasiexperimental pre-post study was performed at the general ED of our hospital. During the pre phase (June 2013-July 2014), all consecutive adult patients with SS/SS were managed according to the standard of care, data were prospectively collected. During the post phase (August 2014-October 2015), patients were managed in collaboration with a dedicated ID team performing a bedside patient evaluation within 1 hour of ED arrival. Results: Overall, 382 patients were included, 195 in the pre phase and 187 in the post phase. Median age was 82 years (interquartile range, 70-88). The most common infection sources were lung (43%) and urinary tract (17%); in 22% of cases, infection source remained unknown. During the post phase, overall compliance with the Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) bundle and appropriateness of initial antibiotic therapy improved from 4.6% to 32% (P < .001) and from 30% to 79% (P < .001), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that predictors of all-cause 14-day mortality were quick sepsis-related organ failure assessment ≥2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.45; P = .007), serum lactate ≥2 mmol/L (HR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.39-3.25; P < .001), and unknown infection source (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.42-3.02; P < .001); being attended during the post phase was a protective factor (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94; P = .026). Conclusion: Implementation of an ID team for the early management of SS/SS in the ED improved the adherence to SSC recommendations and patient survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/cix548

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Viale, P., Tedeschi, S., Scudeller, L., Attard, L., Badia, L., Bartoletti, M., Cascavilla, A., Cristini, F., Dentale, N., Fasulo, G., Legnani, G., Trapani, F., Tumietto, F., Verucchi, G., Virgili, G., Berlingeri, A., Ambretti, S., De Molo, C., Brizi, M., Cavazza, M., & Giannella, M.
Affiliations
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • Policlinico San Matteo Fondazione (IT)
Corresponding author
Giannella, Maddalena
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2017-06-12
Volume
65
Issue
8
Pages
1253-1259
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W2626432801
Cited by
81
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
severe sepsis, septic shock, emergency department, early management, 14-day mortality, lactate, organ failure assessment, infection source, multidisciplinary care
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Analysis of Variance, Communicable Diseases, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Referral and Consultation, Risk Factors, Shock, Septic, Sepsis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review