Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 853

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings

Open access
Kitchin, Rob·2015·Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society

Abstract

This commentary characterises and critiques research on smart cities. I argue that much of the writing and rhetoric about smart cities seeks to appear non-ideological, commonsensical and pragmatic. More critically orientated scholarship, while making vital conceptual and political interventions, presently has four shortcomings that inhibit making sense of and refashioning the smart city agenda: the lack of detailed genealogies of the concept and initiatives, the use of canonical examples and one-size fits all narratives, an absence of in-depth empirical case studies of specific smart city initiatives and comparative research that contrasts smart city developments in different locales and weak collaborative engagement with various stakeholders. These shortcomings are elaborated, accompanied with suggestions for addressing them.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cjres/rsu027

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Datta A . (in press) New urban utopias of postcolonial India: ‘Entrepreneurial urbanization’ in Dholera smart city, Gujarat, Dialogues in Human Geography. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Graham S. Marvin S . (1999) Planning cybercities: integrating telecommunications into urban planning, Town Planning Review, 70: 89–114. · DOI
  3. Graham S. Marvin S . (2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. New York: Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Halpern O. LeCavalier J. Calvillo N. Pietsch W . (2014) Test-bed urbanism, Public Culture, 25: 273–306. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ishida T. Isbister K . (2000) Digital Cities: Technologies, Experiences, and Future Perspectives. LNCS 1765. Berlin: Springer. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Komninos N . (2002) Intelligent Cities: Innovation, Knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces. London: Routledge.
  7. Kourtit K. Nijkamp P. Arribas-Bel D . (2012). Smart cities perspective – A comparative European study by means of self-organizing maps, Innovation, 25: 229–246. · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1080/13604813.2014.906716 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1177/0042098013494427 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Wiig A . (forthcoming) After the Smart City: Global Ambitions and Urban Policymaking in Philadelphia [Doctoral Dissertation]. Philadelphia: Temple University.
  11. Wolfram M . (2012). Deconstructing smart cities: an intertextual reading of concepts and practices for integrated urban and ICT development. In Schrenk M. Popovich V. V. Zeile P. Elisei P (eds.) Re-Mixing the City: Towards Sustainability and Resilience? pp. 171–181. REAL CORP.

Cited by

See all 853

Metadata

Authors
Kitchin, R.
Venue
Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society
Published
2014-10-21
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
131-136
ISSN
  • 1752-1378 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-1386
OpenAlex
W2095455665
Cited by
853
References
4
FWCI
43.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/cjres/rsu027
The paper
Kitchin, R. (2015). Making sense of smart cities: addressing present shortcomings. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsu027

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.