Cited by 399Data Visualization and AnalyticsComputer Graphics and Visualization TechniquesBig Data and Business Intelligence

What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards?

Sarikaya, Alper, Correll, Michael, Bartram, Lyn, Tory, Melanie, Fisher, Danyel·2019·IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Abstract

Dashboards are one of the most common use cases for data visualization, and their design and contexts of use are considerably different from exploratory visualization tools. In this paper, we look at the broad scope of how dashboards are used in practice through an analysis of dashboard examples and documentation about their use. We systematically review the literature surrounding dashboard use, construct a design space for dashboards, and identify major dashboard types. We characterize dashboards by their design goals, levels of interaction, and the practices around them. Our framework and literature review suggest a number of fruitful research directions to better support dashboard design, implementation, and use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/tvcg.2018.2864903

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Presenting too little or highly aggregated information can decrease transparency and limit critical elaboration of the data.

    “Conversely, presenting too little information, or information that is highly aggregated, can decrease transparency and limit critical elaboration of the data”

    From Check the box! How to deal with automation bias in AI-based personnel selection (2023) · cites this paper as Sarikaya et al., 2019

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 63 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sarikaya, A., Correll, M., Bartram, L., Tory, M., & Fisher, D.
Affiliations
  • Tableau Software (United States) (US)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Published
2019-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
682-692
ISSN
  • 1077-2626 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-0506
  • 2160-9306
OpenAlex
W2888652842
Cited by
380
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 2
FWCI
15.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Microsoft Research
  • Tableau Research
  • Simon Fraser University
  • NSERC
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Big Data and Business Intelligence
Keywords
dashboards, data visualization, dashboard design, design space, interaction level

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review