Cited by 45Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityNeutropenia and Cancer InfectionsFungal Infections and Studies

Failure of Systemic Empirical Treatment with Amphotericin B to Prevent Candidemia in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer

Blumberg, E. A., Reboli, A. C.·1996·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Abstract

We undertook a retrospective review of all patients with hematologic malignancies in whom candidemia developed during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in 1989 and 1990. Candidemia developed in 11 patients; five were receiving therapeutic doses of amphotericin B at the time of infection. Disseminated infection occurred in 2 of 5 patients with breakthrough infection and 3 of 6 patients with candidemia before receipt of amphotericin B. Among patients with breakthrough candidemia there was a trend toward more-prolonged neutropenia prior to infection (P = .069), but otherwise they were indistinguishable from other candidemic patients with regard to risk factors for candidemia. Amphotericin B-susceptible Candida albicans was isolated from two patients and Candida krusei from three patients with breakthrough infection. All patients were treated with amphotericin B; all breakthrough infections responded to treatment. Neutropenic patients with breakthrough candidemia were clinically similar to those whose candidemia preceded amphotericin B therapy, and there was no increase in morbidity and mortality among individuals with breakthrough infection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/clinids/22.3.462

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Breakthrough or persistence of candidemia during antifungal therapy suggests an infected intravascular device, significant immunosuppression, or microbiological resistance.

    “Breakthrough (or persistence of) candidemia in the face of ongoing antifungal therapy suggests the possibility of an infected intravascular device [135], significant immunosuppression [136], or microbiological resistance.”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [135]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blumberg, E. A., & Reboli, A. C.
Corresponding author
Blumberg, E. A.
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
462-466
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W1975408222
Cited by
45
References
18
Citations by year
2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neutropenia and Cancer Infections
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
candidemia, amphotericin B, chemotherapy-induced neutropenia, hematologic malignancies, Candida krusei, Candida albicans, antifungal prophylaxis, systemic candidiasis, risk factors
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adult, Aged, Amphotericin B, Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Female, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Male, Middle Aged, Neutropenia, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Failure, Fatal Outcome, Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review